Adams Movie Reviews
More Pages: Adams Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40


Ok!
4 stars for Chris Walken aloneFor one thing, the movie did a poor job of handling Greg Stillson (Martin Sheen), who was more of a major character in the novel. Stillson is way too intriguing a character to simply be shunted aside until the second half of the film. The part of Sarah Bracknell was totally miscast. Also, they chucked the engaging opening of the novel in favor of a more bland introduction, with Johnny and Sarah riding some rinky-dink roller coaster and Johnny suddenly getting a headache. In departing from the start of the novel, the filmmakers miss out on a few important plot points, like Johnny's childhood accident or Johnny's run of luck (all bad, as it turns out) on the Wheel of Fortune at the fair. You never get a sense in the movie that the two main characters have any real chemistry. And much of the novel's dark wit is lost because there is very little mention of Johnny's culture shock when he wakes up.
However, there are also many things that the movie does right, the casting of Dr. Weizak and Sheriff Bannerman in particular. The Castle Rock sequence is particularly chilling, and quite faithful to the book (allowing for the necessary sacrifices in backstory).
Anyways, the bottom line to all the long-winded rhetoric you just read is I would recommend "The Dead Zone" on the strength of Chris Walken's performance alone. ****/5 stars
Worth seeing over and over again.

LOVE MEANS NEVERY HAVING TO SAY A THINGmr. k. has done it big time with this classic. only kaufman can take on shakespeare and come out a head.
wow.
i dig it like a vegtable.
jack e. jett
the jack e. jett show
a decent film...tromatized!
A little strange, but it is Troma
Less a mystery than an affectionate, perfectly modulated character study, Mumford easily represents writer-director Lawrence Kasdan's best work in a decade. While the plot seems whimsically Capra-esque and the dialogue sometimes stilted, it's so carefully and quietly directed that its good will and gentle spirit seem to float lightly off the screen. Kasdan hasn't created such engaging characters since The Big Chill, and all are winning without seeming artificial. Most amazing is Davis, who manages to invest a woman suffering from chronic fatigue syndrome with an inner glow that slowly becomes brighter as the film progresses. And Dean, as the enigmatic Mumford, may have finally found his breakthrough role; after years as an also-ran, he finally emerges as a solid, charming leading man. After Mumford, you won't forget his name, or face. --Mark Englehart

There's Nothing Special To See In This MovieThis is the story of a pseudo-psychologist named Mumford (Loren Dean) who lives and practices in a town named Mumford. He's not the typical shrink. He'll make you feel bad if he has to, he'll tell you to never come back to his office again, and he'll divulge your inner most secrets to anyone who wants to know them. But in spite of his unprofessional approaches to therapy, the whole town seems to love him. We learn half-way through the movie that he's not really a psychologist at all, and everything this town knows about me is completely fraudulent. He's really a former investigator for the Internal Revenue Service who took a few wrong turns in life and decided to completely relinquish his past and start over in this town. The movie shows him treating several very colorful and interesting patients with some very serious problems before his true identity is discovered, though I won't reveal the consequences he must face in the end.
Loren Dean does an adequate job in his performance as a sober-minded psychologist. Though, he's not a terribly gifted actor, and I don't see why anyone would want to give him the lead role in a major movie. Hope Davis, Jason Lee, Alfre Woodard, and Mary McDonnell are also good in their performances as Mumford's patients.
I suppose the reason why this movie wasn't very appealing to me was that the plot was too "by the numbers." In fact, there wasn't much of a plot at all. It relies too much of trying to evoke certain feelings or moods from its audience, which just doesn't ever happen. There's enough substance here to keep a viewer engaged for the duration of the movie, but just not enough to evoke emotion.
Wonderfully pleasant film.THE MOVIE: This wonderfully pleasant film has a steady pace and upbeat attitude throughout. It is a good film for both entertainment and as a catalyst for personal growth introspection. Why is it so difficult for us to change ourselves? Sometimes all we need for change is a little help and trust from someone, but then how easy is it to be so engrossed in our problem and forget about the person who is helping us. Then again, our problems sometimes look so simple from a different perspective.
This film has excellent examples of patience, kindness, firmness, and healthy attitudes. Even with a problem one can have a healthy attitude. No matter how bad a problem, everything's okay. If only we could behave towards others like the psychologist Mumford. Maybe what we need is to spend time in a monastery.
Awww, Crap!Do yourself a favor and don't read any of the other reviews, because some give away the big twist in the middle (ruining the movie for you).
Hey, reviewers, don't ruin the movies for everybody. That just isn't nice


Classic
I prefer the 1984 version of the MutinyAs far as the storyline is concerned, THE BOUNTY tells its side of the story well. Bligh as portrayed as an authoritarian leader who has to deal with a crew of insubordinates, led by a lovestruck Christian. Their stay in Tahiti among the native population changes the mood of the crew. But Bligh knows what the true mission of his voyage, and tries (but fails) to remind his men that they are really transporters of breadfruit plants from Tahiti to Jamaica. Ultimately, Bligh's onscreen rages are convincing (whereas the 1935 version portrays Bligh's behavior as the whims of a crazy old man). The climax of the film, the mutiny itself, is very well done, as the tempers of all involved come to the surface.
There is no denying the exquisite look to this film, and it is better served on the big screen. The period dress is impeccable, and it gives the film a historically accurate tone. What actually happened between Bligh and Christian in 1787 may remain a mystery forever, but I feel that THE BOUNTY is the ultimate and most satisfying statement of the information left for us.
Melvin Looked GREAT, And An Alternative TitleA great alternative title for this film, given the magnificent scenes featuring the robust Tahiti female characters, would have been "The Bouncy."


greekgodawful
70's Fun with Arnold...The music is heavily zithered, a la "The Third Man", but seems oddly appropriate to the film. It actually grows on you, believe it or not. We get an interesting view of the gods hanging out on Mount Olympus, and we meet a dashing Pluto (AKA Death). Tony 'Mr.World' Carroll cameos in a weightlifting contest with Herc, and "Dark Shadows" alum Tracy Loomis plays Herc's love interest, Helen. Soap opera regular Ernest Graves steals all of his scenes as Zeus.
On the DVD, you can choose between the Real Arnold voice track, and the dubbed voice track. I sampled the dubbed version, and then quickly opted for the Real Arnold, with his classic Arnold accent that renders him almost unintelligible ("Eye yam Her-cue-leesse!"). The dubbing is classic in it's own way, however, with the ridiculously deep, white, all-American, manly voice so common to dubbed pictures of Herc, et al. But, with an Arnold movie, we need the sound of Arnold's own vocal undulations as he navigates the rocky waters of the English language.
Arnold Stang actually gets top billing over Arnold Strong (Schwarzenegger). Stang was a memorable, but largely forgotten comedian from the golden age of television. Perhaps most memorable for the voices of "Top Cat" (Hanna-Barbera)and "Herman" (Famous Studios), Stang also appeared in "It's a Mad Mad Mad Mad World". Here, Stang plays the goofy schlub "Pretzie" (so named because he sells pretzels), a perpetually bewildered person who befriends the bewildered Herc.
Herc has been cast out of Olympus for talking smack to his dad, Zeus. Herc wants to meet new people, and see the mortal world, and when Zeus gets tired of hearing about it, he hurls a lightning bolt (which looks suspiciously like a bent piece of re-bar that was spray painted silver), and POOF! Herc is falling to Earth. Before you know it, he's teaching athletes how to throw the discus and javelins, becoming outraged when he sees a movie poster for a Herc movie, beating up escaped grizzly bears, etc. He also starts making time with the daughter of a college professor (with an interest in mythology, of course), and takes up wrestling.
Half the fun is Arnold's acting. The other half is the valiant attempt of the filmmakers in making lemons out of lemonade on their skimpy budget. Stang is a bit over the top at times, but really helps to keep things moving in a typical kid's movie kind of way.
Probably the biggest flaw with the movie is that the relationship between Herc and Helen is never resolved. In fact, Helen inexplicably vanishes before the movie is all wrapped up. The movie does end delightfully, with the mighty Zeus casting an eye towards his old stomping grounds, but the loose ends are kind of annoying.
Besides the dual voice track, the DVD also offers some TV spots from the movie's 1980 re-release (post-"Conan"), in which Arnold is given heavy play.
The DVD is a must-have for Arnold fans, or fans of low-budget dreck for the 70's. Suitable as a guilty pleasure, or as a treat for the kid in all of us.
Hot dogs, Pretzy, and Airplanes!!!!

What has 3 heads, two tails, and shoots lightning bolts??
one of the better Godzilla filmsIn my opinion there is one fatal flaw in the editing of this movie: When astronaut Glen and Fuji lift off after having met the controller of Planet X and hearing his plea to "borrow" Godzilla and Rodan, there is a cut to the shot of the controller making a sinister laugh. Prior to this, we, the audience, at this point have no reason to believe that Planet X is not being sincere, so this just kills the story in terms of revealing the plot way too soon. When they play the tape of the "miracle drug" formula, we already pretty much know that whatever's going to happen won't be good. Anyway that's just my pet peeve about this movie, otherwise I like it.
5 Stars For The Fun

a groovy time
I had hopes for a good satire but it's not here.
Screwball Genius

Don't pay the 50 bucks!
WONDERFUL!
EXCELLENT MOVIE...If you enjoy the art...you will love it.!!

Fun and well acted
Definitely good
ANGELS on EarthAn angel on Earth is all they can be with love, hope, and charity. The movie MICHAEL shows us that even an angel does NOT
need to be Perfect. God and Love and Respect can cover a lot of
ground even here on Earth.
Thanks.
Amen


Great 70s Science Fiction, Horrible CommentaryThis DVD edition is good--for the price. The movie has not been restored by any means, but seeing it widescreen for the first time in a long time is a treat. The vintage promo "making of" documentary is of the classic mold, deep voiced narrator and all.
BUT Norman Jewison's commentary track is absolutely worthless; a prime example of the worst kind of blah blah commentary there is. This is the kind with a LOT of silent time. When he does talk, the guy can't even seem to get the words out ("Uh.....uh....this....uhhh...). And if he does get the words out, he usually just tells us what's happening on the screen (something we can obviously see for ourselves, given that this isnt' a radio play). Or he pontificates endlessly on the film's themes, explaining them as though we're all to stupid to understand the "individual v the corporate" storyline. Mention it, sure, but Norman, we don't have to be told for twenty minutes! Damn!
The only worse commentary I've heard was Kinka Usher's on the "Mystery Men" dvd. But at least that revealed something of interest--that the self-impressed Usher didn't have a talented bone in his body.
Directors who are not natural raccontours should be paired with (or replaced by) film historians on commentary tracks, the better to pull out of them the interesting stuff we know they must have in their heads. Not everyone is a John Carpenter or Larry Cohen, two of the best at this there are, no matter what you think of their films.
Anyway, Rollerball is still worth 8 or 9 bucks. Buy it.
Better than the remake.
"This was never meant to be a game! Never!"The action is great and strangly hypnotizing as skaters and motorcyclists race around a large circular track, trying to throw a steel metal ball into a basket.
John Housman makes one of the best establishment heavys as he hints, demands, and threatens Johnathan to retire. For people that like gladiator movies, sports action, or the lone man trying to survive, Rollerball will excite you. You'll be shouting Johnathan's name along with the crowd. And after it's over, you'll feel like taking on the world. Yes, a great motivational movie as well.
Pay no attention to remake. This is the one and only "Rollerball".