Science Movie Reviews


Related Subjects: Family Movie Review Academic_Papers Africa Agriculture Alchemy Alternative American_Studies Ancient_Egypt Anomalous_People Anthropology Asia Astronomy Biology Carter,_Howard Central_America Chemistry Chupacabra Cognitive_Science Communication Conferences Contractors_and_Consultants Criticism_of_Darwinism Demography_and_Population_Studies Earth_Sciences Economics Education Educational_Resources Employment Environment Ethnic_Relations Ethnic_Studies Europe Family_and_Consumer_Science Flat_Earth Forensic_Science Geography Geology,_Alternative Guidelines_and_Codes History Hoaxes Institutions Instruments_and_Supplies Ireland Jersey_Devil Language_and_Linguistics Mariette,_Auguste Math Methods_and_Techniques Middle_East Mothman North_America Oceania Periods_and_Cultures Physics Political_Science Potassium-Argon_Dating Psychology Public_Administration Publications Recreation_and_Leisure_Studies Reference Rural_Sociology Science_and_Technology_Policy Software South_America South_Pacific_Studies Survey Technology The_Philadelphia_Experiment Theses_and_Abstracts Tools Topics Voynich_Manuscript
More Pages: Science Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53
Family movie reviews for "Science" sorted by average review score:

V - The Final Battle
Released in DVD by Warner Home Video (06 August, 2002)
MPAA Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Director: Richard T. Heffron
Though followers of current science fiction television series may dismiss V: The Final Battle as a quaint relic from the pre-computer animation days, the six-hour miniseries about an alien invasion of Earth was a ratings juggernaut for NBC in 1984 and should still provide some entertainment for hard-bitten devotees and fans of '50s-style sci-fi. The Final Battle picks up four months after the shock conclusion of the 1983 prequel miniseries, with a small group of humans known as the Resistance struggling to convince their fellow humans that a fleet of seemingly friendly visitors from space are in fact bent on world domination.

Executive producer Kenneth Johnson (who oversaw most aspects of the first series) only supervised the sequel's script (which underwent several changes before its airing), and the writing occasionally suffers due to the lack of his attention. But the series still delivers its share of action and intrigue, as well as one showstopping gruesome moment involving the birth of interspecies twins. Acting is again a stumbling block, with leads Marc Singer and Faye Grant as bland as any performers from the American International Pictures stable; character actor Michael Ironside makes the strongest impression as a tough Resistance member, and a pre-Freddy Krueger Robert Englund is amusing as a kind-hearted alien. The miniseries was followed by an inevitable weekly series featuring most of the same cast, which was demolished in the ratings by Dallas, but a faithful Resistance-like following remains to this day. --Paul Gaita

Average review score:

Where's the beef, er... mice.
I was pretty impressed that the first set of episodes, released in 1983 for television, were recorded in stereo. That DVD set, at half the price of this second DVD set, had a reasonably realistic DD 2.0 surround presentation. But this series of episodes, originally released in 1984, is offered in big, fat MONO for twice the price. What a rip-off.

Hostile aliens invading our world
Hi, there. Please note that I have not bought "V" (Humanity's last stand" and "The final battle") at Amazon, but am a great fan of this series since I'm a kid. I was wishing to find them, one day, on DVD... And I did. I enjoy watching them over and over again. It is a mixture of war (I find the action scenes ... How should I say... Full of action), humanity (The men and women are no longer separated by racial barriers, they all come from different horizons), romance (What would it be without that) and many other themes and especially a genuine intrigue.
Let's just say I encourage you to buy it...
Jeff

TO V OR NOT TO V...
Anyone who has seen "V" will want to see this sequel, as well. "V" was one of most original made-for-television movie of its time. It spawned this sequel and its very own television series. It was able to do this with a cast of virtual unknowns because of the strength of its story line. "V" is simply great sci-fi, and "V - The Final Battle" is a must have DVD for all those fans who enjoyed the original mini-series.

As those of you familiar with "V" already know, human looking alien visitors landed on Earth, led by an alien innocuously called John (Richard Herd), who gave Earth a benevolent message that fooled many into thinking that the visitors came in peace. Some humans even ended up working collaboratively with them. There were some, however, that were skeptical of the visitors' motives, and mistrust turned to fear when scientists and doctors began to be rounded up and mysteriously disappeared.

Mike Donovan (Marc Singer), a hunky cameraman, had his own misgivings about the aliens, but once he observed the visitors literally shedding their skins, revealing that that they were not human at all, but rather, nothing more than reptilian looking aliens, his misgivings were reinforced. Mike also discovered that they meant mankind harm and were hell-bent of the conquest of Earth and divestiture of one of Earth's most important natural resources without which humans cannot live.

Mike joined the resistance, headed by beautiful medical doctor, Julie Parish (Faye Grant). As the underground resistance battled the visitors, many humans were still convinced that the visitors were benevolent and being misjudged by these so-called freedom fighters. As fascist rule supplanted democratic government throughout the world, under the pretext of law and order and at the direction of the visitors and at the behest of their human puppets, the viewer cannot help but be aware of the allegorical implications.

This two disc DVD provides three episodic treats. The resistance continues its struggle against the visitors with the assistance of an alien fifth column, working secretly together, side by side. Mike Donovan and Julie Parish are now joined by irascible and laconic Ham Tyler (Michael Ironside), a former special forces agent with a chip on his shoulder and the military strategy necessary to coalesce the resistance movement into a lean, mean, fighting machine.

This sequel mini-series is action packed, as the visitors and the resistance fighters duke it out for control over the Earth. The exquisitely beautiful, evil alien, Diana (Jane Badler), stops at nothing to secure her ambitions. Not content with being the science officer for the invading forces, she seeks military glory at all cost. She is the one from whom both humans and aliens have much to fear.

The allegorical thread also continues, as humans begin to be rounded up routinely and trucked off to a processing plant. After all, it is the visitors fervent desire to serve man...literally. It seems that in addition to the Earth's water, the visitors are secretly looking to humans as a food source.

There are some interesting special effects for its time, as well as some cheesy ones. There are also some key performances. Most notable are those of Jane Badler, in the role of the diabolical Diana, and Michael Ironside, as Ham Tyler, the alien hating resistance fighter. Look also for Robert Englund, who would go on to Freddy Kreuger fame the same year as the release of this mini-series sequel. He continues in the role of Willie, a peaceful loving visitor who allies himself with the resistance.

This film has everything, suspense, action, thrills, a gripping story line, a moral message, and an inter-species birth. How can anyone resist? This is sci-fi as it should be. Bravo!

The DVD provides a crystal clear, widescreen picture and perfect audio, but little else. It provides none of the interesting extras found on the "V" DVD. Instead, the buyer will have to be satisfied with the usual interactive menus, as well as scene access, and subtitles available in English, French. Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Bahasa, Thai, and Korean. All in all, notwithstanding its shortcomings, this is a DVD well worth having in one's collection, if one is a sci-fi diehard.

It is unfortunate that the television series based upon this highly successful mini-series did not fare well. The knuckleheads in charge of programming sentenced it to death right from the beginning by scheduling it opposite the then number one television show, "Dallas". The series never even had a chance coming out of the gate. I only hope that a DVD collection of the series will be forthcoming.


Steven Spielberg Presents Taken
Released in DVD by Universal Studios (21 October, 2003)
MPAA Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Starring: Steven Spielberg
Steven Spielberg's alien abduction opus Taken is what happens when you cross-breed Close Encounters of the Third Kind with The Waltons. Obviously flushed with the success of the TV miniseries Band of Brothers, Spielberg's Dreamworks studio has created an equally epic 10-part story chronicling 50 years of habitual abduction over several generations of three American families. Beginning with the most notorious alien cover-up in U.S. history, the 1947 "crash" at Roswell, New Mexico, Taken introduces the "Greys" and the families they routinely abduct, probe, and, in a couple of cases, impregnate over the course of the ten 90-minute episodes. The three families are: the Keys, from which first Russell, then his son Jessie, then grandson Danny, are all abducted; the Clarkes, who are descended from a liaison between lonely put-upon housewife Sally Clarke and one of the Roswell crash survivors; and the Crawfords, the ruthless G-men who are committed to uncovering the purpose behind the alien visitations at any cost.

It's this question that forms the main thread of the story: but even though the Greys' actions are at best ambiguous and at worst hostile, the viewer can't help feeling that after all this systematic abuse of their human test subjects the aliens will in the end present them with a cure for cancer. In fact, Taken is Spielberg at his most touchy-feely: for all its science fiction trappings it's basically a soap opera, lacking the sinister undercurrent of either Dark Skies or The X-Files. Nevertheless, it's an engaging series with decent performances--most notably Joel Gretsch as psychotic Owen Crawford--good special effects, and an engaging enough storyline to make it entertaining, if somewhat disposable, TV. --Kristen Bowditch

Average review score:

Yawn. Is it Over Yet?
Taken (aka T-person-ken) is a fairly lengthy sci-fi miniseries which originally aired on the Sci-Fi channel. Besides being about alien abduction, it carries the imprimatur of Stephen Spielberg! What could be better? Unfortunately, the series suffers from one fatal flaw: NOTHING EVER HAPPENS! Thats right, after dutifully punching in night after night, waiting for the good stuff to kick in, the series finally ends leaving the viewer with nothing but occasional glimpses of interesting alien stuff. On the upside, Matt Frewer is pretty good in this series. (Oh I just remembered, Matt Frewer's good performance was exactly cancelled out by the chick from "The Blair Witch Project", so never mind.)

I was instantly hooked....
I was instantly hooked after watching the first episode of Stephen Spielbergs 10 part mini series Taken. A remarkable story about 3 families and their experiences with Aliens, which spans almost 50 years. Extradordinary writing, impressive special effects, and mostly strong performances from a cast of relative unknows. The best performances come from the adorable Dakota Fanning. This little girl gives a heartfelt, and moving performance as Allie Keys. Emily Bergl (Carrie 2: The Rage) also gives a strong, emotional peformance as Allie mother. Other noteworthy performances come from Adam Kaufman as Charlie and Joel Gretsh as Owen Crawford. There are a few things that bothered me which is why I gave it only 4 stars. Heather Donahue(Blair Witch Project girl) is absolutley atrocious, and she almost made me fast forward her scenes. Unbearable. Matt Frewer is also terrible, and way over the top, and his comedic skills are way out of place. Overall, the story was amazing, and I loved how the three families were all connected and the writer did a wonderful job at not confusing the audience, which could have happened in a 14 hr mini series. I definetly reccomend Taken. You won't be able to wait to see what happens next.

I was Taken by surprise
Steven Spielberg's was both interesting and worth while. Hearing stories my grandpa told me about being in the army at the time of WW2 during the Roswell crash, i took an intrest in hearing other stories on the alien encounter. Anything Sci-Fi is always a good hobby and it keeps you thinking. but i didn't know is how all the other stuff in the show came into play. Half the time it had nothing to do with sci-fi or aliens. I definately recommend the book, it too is equally interesting.


Westworld
Released in DVD by Warner Studios (03 July, 2001)
MPAA Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Director: Michael Crichton
Starring: Yul Brynner and Richard Benjamin
Welcome to Delos, the high-tech Disneyland for adults that Michael Crichton created for Westworld, a nifty science fiction thriller from 1973 that also marked the popular novelist's feature-film directorial debut. The movie is so named because the vacationing buddies who travel to Delos (James Brolin, Richard Benjamin) choose Westworld as their destination (the other choices being Roman World and Medieval World), where they are free to indulge their movie-inspired fantasies of the Wild West. From brothel beauties to black-hatted gunslingers (like the villain played by Yul Brynner), the place is populated by perfectly humanlike robots programmed and monitored to cater to every guest's fancy. But fun turns into abject horror when the robots--particularly Brynner's badman--begin to malfunction and Delos turns into an amusement park that's anything but amusing. Westworld has moments of camp and the look of a low-budget backlot production, but two decades before Crichton revamped his idea to create Jurassic Park, this movie made the most of its interesting and exciting premise. --Jeff Shannon
Average review score:

A Disneyland Nightmare!
Michael Crichton had the vision in this story that would return for Jurassic Park 20 years later. This movie would lay the foundation for it. It still packs a wallop! The suspense still lingers after its over. An enjoyable ride in to the future.

Draw!
I am not ashamed in the least to admit that the 1973 science fiction thriller "Westworld" is one of my all time favorite movies. I first saw it about twenty years ago and never forgot it, so when I had the opportunity to watch it again recently I jumped at the chance. I can easily say that I still found this picture still compelling with its mixture of futuristic elements and chilling suspense. Directed by big shot novelist Michael Crichton, the creator of "Jurassic Park," "The Andromeda Strain," and "Congo," "Westworld" may constitute his most compelling work to date in either print or on the big screen. Why? Because even at this early date Crichton effectively displays his concerns over technology and how mankind adapts to technical innovations. Not surprisingly, at least to anyone familiar with Crichton, man suffers plenty in "Westworld." It is important to remember that this writer/director is not the only creative talent dealing with the seeming incompatibility of man and machine: writer J.G. Ballard and director David Cronenberg have been exploring these vistas for decades now. Crichton holds his own with both of these visionaries, and "Westworld" resoundingly proves it.

"Westworld" begins with a lengthy commercial touting the benefits of vacationing at Delos, a company that runs a most unusual theme park. For only one thousand dollars a day (in 1973 dollars!), the curious can star in their own version of the Wild West (Westworld), Medieval Europe (Medievalworld), or in the decadent splendor of Rome (Romanworld). A steep price to play for such diversions, to be sure, but Delos employs amazingly realistic robots and stylish props to completely recreate these eras. A visitor to the Delos amusement park can fight a knight to win the hand of a queen, gun down outlaws in the streets, or take part in a Roman banquet. The robot characters look so real that it is difficult to tell them apart from the other guests, a fact that adds a real dimension of excitement to the experience when you stand down someone at the end of a gun barrel. Obviously, Delos cannot have guests dying violently left and right, so they engineered the props, like guns, to only fire at "cold" machines. An enormous army of technicians runs the show from an underground control center where the worlds undergo constant scrutiny and where employees repair robots "killed" or "injured" in the day's activities. Despite a few worrisome problems, mainly regarding some sort of emerging computer "virus" that mystifies the techies, Delos operates without many serious hitches.

Enter the main characters of the film, two business types looking for fun played by Richard Benjamin and James Brolin. Both decide to go to Westworld, and after donning western style clothing complete with firearms, they start their adventure. What follows is every western film cliché imaginable. The two take part in a bar brawl, share special relationships with the local ladies, and orchestrate a jailbreak. Moreover, the two soon earn the enmity of the local gunslinger, a sinister, shining eyed figure clad in black played with frosty efficiency by Yul Brynner. The shootouts involving the gunslinger look as though Crichton lifted them from a Sam Peckinpah movie, with blood spraying in slow motion splendor. "Westworld" even includes a nicely done "guy on fire scene," one of the best in cinematic history. The movie occasionally shifts to Medievalworld to follow the exploits of one of the park visitors there, but most of the action involves what is going on in Westworld. Look for Dick Van Patten in a smaller role as a white bread businessman who soon learns a thing or two about manhood at the theme park.

The last part of the film, after the computer virus causes the robots to rebel against their human masters, shifts the focus of the film from science fiction fare to a harrowing thriller. I think one of the grimmest, chilliest sequences in film history involves Brynner's single-minded pursuit of Richard Benjamin through the desert and mountains surrounding Delos. I can still hear the sound of the gunslinger's boots clicking down the long hallways of Delos's control center as he marches to the final showdown with his prey. Who will win in the battle between technology and man? Benjamin's character must apply the lessons he learned about being a man during his stay at Westworld to save his own life at the conclusion of the film, but it won't be easy triumphing over an unthinking killing machine.

Flaws do abound in this movie. How does Delos insure that swords and similar weaponry in Medievalworld won't hurt real guests? Why do the hands on two immobile robots change position in various shots? How can the gunslinger detect the heat patterns from Benjamin's feet on a sunny day, especially considering Benjamin was wearing boots and had left the tracks at least ten minutes before the gunslinger saw them? These are minor problems, but they are noticeable after repeated viewings. Overall, "Westworld" is a grand slam homerun that every science fiction fan must watch at some point. Regrettably, the movie did not receive a worthy DVD release. The film's transfer quality isn't bad, but it isn't great, either. A trailer is the only extra, so forget about listening to a commentary or seeing any production stills, cast bios, behind the scenes footage, or deleted scenes. Oh well, at least "Westworld" made it to DVD. For that, we can all be thankful.

great sci-fi
back in 1973, hi tech sci fi , was beginning to show up on the screen on a regular basis, although a few weak moments are in the film, this sci0-fi gem is a must for collectors.
i would imagine, a up dated version would be great and a re make would generate a new fan base, perhaps, tom berringer
as the cowboy-bad guy...a.k.a. yul brynners role...


Westworld
Released in DVD by Warner Studios (29 September, 1998)
MPAA Rating: PG (Parental Guidance Suggested)
Director: Michael Crichton
Starring: Yul Brynner and Richard Benjamin
Welcome to Delos, the high-tech Disneyland for adults that Michael Crichton created for Westworld, a nifty science fiction thriller from 1973 that also marked the popular novelist's feature-film directorial debut. The movie is so named because the vacationing buddies who travel to Delos (James Brolin, Richard Benjamin) choose Westworld as their destination (the other choices being Roman World and Medieval World), where they are free to indulge their movie-inspired fantasies of the Wild West. From brothel beauties to black-hatted gunslingers (like the villain played by Yul Brynner), the place is populated by perfectly humanlike robots programmed and monitored to cater to every guest's fancy. But fun turns into abject horror when the robots--particularly Brynner's badman--begin to malfunction and Delos turns into an amusement park that's anything but amusing. Westworld has moments of camp and the look of a low-budget backlot production, but two decades before Crichton revamped his idea to create Jurassic Park, this movie made the most of its interesting and exciting premise. --Jeff Shannon
Average review score:

A Disneyland Nightmare!
Michael Crichton had the vision in this story that would return for Jurassic Park 20 years later. This movie would lay the foundation for it. It still packs a wallop! The suspense still lingers after its over. An enjoyable ride in to the future.

Draw!
I am not ashamed in the least to admit that the 1973 science fiction thriller "Westworld" is one of my all time favorite movies. I first saw it about twenty years ago and never forgot it, so when I had the opportunity to watch it again recently I jumped at the chance. I can easily say that I still found this picture still compelling with its mixture of futuristic elements and chilling suspense. Directed by big shot novelist Michael Crichton, the creator of "Jurassic Park," "The Andromeda Strain," and "Congo," "Westworld" may constitute his most compelling work to date in either print or on the big screen. Why? Because even at this early date Crichton effectively displays his concerns over technology and how mankind adapts to technical innovations. Not surprisingly, at least to anyone familiar with Crichton, man suffers plenty in "Westworld." It is important to remember that this writer/director is not the only creative talent dealing with the seeming incompatibility of man and machine: writer J.G. Ballard and director David Cronenberg have been exploring these vistas for decades now. Crichton holds his own with both of these visionaries, and "Westworld" resoundingly proves it.

"Westworld" begins with a lengthy commercial touting the benefits of vacationing at Delos, a company that runs a most unusual theme park. For only one thousand dollars a day (in 1973 dollars!), the curious can star in their own version of the Wild West (Westworld), Medieval Europe (Medievalworld), or in the decadent splendor of Rome (Romanworld). A steep price to play for such diversions, to be sure, but Delos employs amazingly realistic robots and stylish props to completely recreate these eras. A visitor to the Delos amusement park can fight a knight to win the hand of a queen, gun down outlaws in the streets, or take part in a Roman banquet. The robot characters look so real that it is difficult to tell them apart from the other guests, a fact that adds a real dimension of excitement to the experience when you stand down someone at the end of a gun barrel. Obviously, Delos cannot have guests dying violently left and right, so they engineered the props, like guns, to only fire at "cold" machines. An enormous army of technicians runs the show from an underground control center where the worlds undergo constant scrutiny and where employees repair robots "killed" or "injured" in the day's activities. Despite a few worrisome problems, mainly regarding some sort of emerging computer "virus" that mystifies the techies, Delos operates without many serious hitches.

Enter the main characters of the film, two business types looking for fun played by Richard Benjamin and James Brolin. Both decide to go to Westworld, and after donning western style clothing complete with firearms, they start their adventure. What follows is every western film cliché imaginable. The two take part in a bar brawl, share special relationships with the local ladies, and orchestrate a jailbreak. Moreover, the two soon earn the enmity of the local gunslinger, a sinister, shining eyed figure clad in black played with frosty efficiency by Yul Brynner. The shootouts involving the gunslinger look as though Crichton lifted them from a Sam Peckinpah movie, with blood spraying in slow motion splendor. "Westworld" even includes a nicely done "guy on fire scene," one of the best in cinematic history. The movie occasionally shifts to Medievalworld to follow the exploits of one of the park visitors there, but most of the action involves what is going on in Westworld. Look for Dick Van Patten in a smaller role as a white bread businessman who soon learns a thing or two about manhood at the theme park.

The last part of the film, after the computer virus causes the robots to rebel against their human masters, shifts the focus of the film from science fiction fare to a harrowing thriller. I think one of the grimmest, chilliest sequences in film history involves Brynner's single-minded pursuit of Richard Benjamin through the desert and mountains surrounding Delos. I can still hear the sound of the gunslinger's boots clicking down the long hallways of Delos's control center as he marches to the final showdown with his prey. Who will win in the battle between technology and man? Benjamin's character must apply the lessons he learned about being a man during his stay at Westworld to save his own life at the conclusion of the film, but it won't be easy triumphing over an unthinking killing machine.

Flaws do abound in this movie. How does Delos insure that swords and similar weaponry in Medievalworld won't hurt real guests? Why do the hands on two immobile robots change position in various shots? How can the gunslinger detect the heat patterns from Benjamin's feet on a sunny day, especially considering Benjamin was wearing boots and had left the tracks at least ten minutes before the gunslinger saw them? These are minor problems, but they are noticeable after repeated viewings. Overall, "Westworld" is a grand slam homerun that every science fiction fan must watch at some point. Regrettably, the movie did not receive a worthy DVD release. The film's transfer quality isn't bad, but it isn't great, either. A trailer is the only extra, so forget about listening to a commentary or seeing any production stills, cast bios, behind the scenes footage, or deleted scenes. Oh well, at least "Westworld" made it to DVD. For that, we can all be thankful.

great sci-fi
back in 1973, hi tech sci fi , was beginning to show up on the screen on a regular basis, although a few weak moments are in the film, this sci0-fi gem is a must for collectors.
i would imagine, a up dated version would be great and a re make would generate a new fan base, perhaps, tom berringer
as the cowboy-bad guy...a.k.a. yul brynners role...


Earth vs. the Flying Saucers
Released in DVD by Columbia Tristar Hom (27 May, 2003)
MPAA Rating: Unrated
Director: Fred F. Sears
Starring: Hugh Marlowe and Joan Taylor
A textbook example of '50s-era science fiction, Earth vs. the Flying Saucers boasts not only a solid script and competent performances, but some genuinely impressive stop-motion effects courtesy of one of the industry's uncontested masters, Ray Harryhausen. Scientist Hugh Marlowe (who faced a more benevolent invader from space five years earlier in The Day the Earth Stood Still) discovers that UFOs are responsible for the destruction of a series of exploratory space rockets launched by his space exploration project. The saucers' helmeted pilots land on Earth and deliver an ultimatum to humanity via Marlowe: fealty or complete annihilation.

Harryhausen's painstakingly intricate saucers and the destruction they wreak (particularly during an assault on Washington, D.C.) are the film's unquestionable highlights, but Marlowe and Joan Taylor (as his wife/partner) are capable leads, and veteran B director Fred F. Sears doesn't let the dialogue and expositional scenes fall apart in between the barrage of effects. Earth vs. the Flying Saucers is a fun and effective slice of sci-fi that should please younger audiences as well as nostalgic return viewers. Sears later reused some of the effects footage for his jaw-droppingly awful 1957 effort, The Giant Claw. --Paul Gaita

Average review score:

This movie still rules.
This is the mother of all invasion movies here. Filmed in gorgeous black and white, and coming out two years before the Technicolor blitzkrieg of War of the Worlds, EVTFS is still superior on just about every level. The special effects, laughable to some who judge only by today's standards, are still eye-popping. The first half of the movie is mostly dialogue driven and is designed to up the suspense ante by stages. The second half is the reason to see it as the flying saucers (and Harryhausen!) pull out all the stops and go whole-hog on the invasion. The painstaking model work is just extraordinary, especially the destruction of the capitol building. Although an obvious product of the coldwar and the McCarthy eras, the movie, with its Us vs. Them mentality, is still very relavant today. You need only look at the headlines about American foreign policy to see this. Although EVTFS may come across as an exercise in coldwar paranoia, I would like to think that it is an exercise in optimism. For anyone living in those times and having to face the fact that almost two thirds of the world was on the way to becoming communist, if not already there, those must have seemed like dark times indeed. Like its modern day version, Independance Day, Earth shows that any problem can be overcome if people just put down their differences and work together. This, I think is the greatest strength Earth vs. The Flying Saucers. It's a good belief-for any time or age.

Best of the Best
Years ago, I had the opportunity to meet Ray during a science fiction festival and he was so happy with the way his movie turned out that he responded to me like this, "You know, I made that movie so real that everyone thought I had actually met someone from out in space" I believe he was German and what a nice, humble man. I wonder if he is still living today. Anyway, this is the "best of the best - and it was made at a time when everything was clay-mation, imagine no computers. Now since it is in DVD it will hold the clarity and picture quality needed for this priceless gem.

Entertaining 50's scifi, with plenty of extras
"Earth vs. the Flying Saucers" is one of those movies that helped define the science fiction thriller of the 1950's. It features a lantern-jawed scientist as hero, his intelligent but doting love interest, and a very straightforward flying saucer invasion.

Like "Independence Day" the movie is a race against time -- the scientists and military must find a way to defeat the aliens before they succeed in their plan to conquer the Earth-- but "Earth vs. the Flying Saucers" is a better movie than "Independence Day". It's leaner, meaner and better-written. And Ray Harryhausen's special effects still look great today.

And what a great, great job Columbia did with this disc. The film has been digitally cleaned up and presented in widescreen, and there are some great extras -- Joe Dante interviews Ray Harryhausen about the film, and there is a short promotional film about Harryhausen's Dynamation process. A commentary track would have been welcome, but for a B-movie from the 50's, this is above and beyond. Thanks to everyone at Columbia who made it possible.


The Man Who Fell to Earth
Released in DVD by Fox Lorber (01 October, 2002)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Nicolas Roeg
Starring: David Bowie, Rip Torn, and Candy Clark
While other films directed by Nicolas Roeg have attained similar cult status (including Walkabout and Don't Look Now), none has been as hotly debated as this languid but oddly fascinating adaptation of the science fiction novel by Walter Tevis. David Bowie plays the alien of the title, who arrives on Earth with hopes of finding a way to save his own planet from turning into an arid wasteland. He funds this effort by capitalizing on several highly lucrative inventions, and in so doing becomes the powerful leader of an international corporate conglomerate. But his success has negative consequences as well--his contact with Earth has a disintegrating effect that sends him into a tailspin of disorientation and metaphysical despair. The sexual attention of a cheerful young woman (Candy Clark) doesn't do much to change his outlook, and his introduction to liquor proves even more devastating, until, finally, it looks as though his visit to Earth may be a permanent one. The Man Who Fell to Earth is definitely not for every taste--it's a highly contemplative, primarily visual experience that Roeg directs as an abstract treatise on (among other things) the alienating effects of an over-commercialized society. Stimulating and hypnotic or frightfully dull, depending on your receptiveness to its loosely knit ideas, it's at least in part about not belonging, about being disconnected from the world--about being a stranger in a strange land when there's really no place like home. --Jeff Shannon.
Average review score:

Die Hard Fans Only
First off, let me say that I am a huge Bowie fan, owning and loving all of his original albums. But I simply did not enjoy this movie. Not at all really.
The story itself is neat, but it takes, well, a paragraph to describe (which I'll let you read in other reviews), and then you've got it. There's nothing more to it, there are no plot twists, nothing amazing or new. The movie moves so slow, it seems to go on for hours, and it's never exciting, just boring.
The acting from all performers in the movie is just fine, but the way the movie was put together is pretty bad. The script is barely there at all, the cinematography is dull and unoriginal, the alien design seems much older than it is, and doesn't impress. There's also a lot of sex in this movie, which I have no objections to, but it's put together in such odd ways, and never really makes sense that it's in there.
To put it simply, I guarantee you that if this movie didn't have David Bowie it wouldn't be remembered at all. The only thing neat about this movie is that I saw where the cover for "Station to Station" and "Low" came from. Sadly, you're really not missing anything, but if you're a huge fan like me, you'll have to see it for yourself.

Nicholas Roeg at his best
It's a shame that only 5 stars can be given to this classic film.
David Bowie, whom I adore anyway, makes an excellent debut in this superb film.

The film follows Walter Tevis's novel very well and adapts to the screen to create a very saddening tale of corporate America and how it can be a boon or a bust to some, including aliens.

That alone is a scary thought.

Upon his arrival from a dying planet, Thomas Jerome Newton sets out to create an empire to obtain money to purchase water for his dying planet. Occasional scenes are shown of him leaving his wife and children behind, and throughout the film we see other scenes of them waiting for his return.

What is never shown is how he is going to transport this to his home planet.

Along the way to his path to success, he is plagued by metaphorical leeches who will do anything to stop him. Greed, lust, and several other deadly sins are thrust upon our protaganist as he tries in vain to overcome them in the process.

David Bowie was the perfect person to be cast for this movie. He moves along in it with an icy perfection that is or was appropriate to his character at the time.

Keep in mind, this film is not without it's flaws. Some scenes were restored to make this the original theatrical release. One involving Rip Torn and his student could have been done without as it makes no sense and attributes nothing to the overall affect of the movie. Again, that is just an opinion, and die hard fans of this movie will be happy that it is included.

This film, upon it's release, was well ahead of its time and to this day, many of the themes implied still are appropiate to what constitutes success vs. failure in the American business sense.

The films ends on a saddening note, however, and should be a reminder that what goes around, comes around. You do not have to be a fan of David Bowie to appreciate this film, he just makes it all work and the end result is stunning. Nicholas Roeg did everything possible to steer away from the persona of David Bowie and his music. The end result is a very good solid acting part on his behalf. Ironically, some of the incidental music later became working pieces on David Bowie's LOW album, which has a stunning shot from the movie. Highly recommended, and not for anyone looking for a quick plot or storyline and a happy ending, this film is chock full of storylines and plots that keeps you interested throughtout it's prescence.

A Special Experience
Many may call it dull and disjointed, too abstract or just give it a pass, since they haven't heard of it anyway! But they'd be missing a great movie, a unique and intellectual work of art. And that it is. I myself have never been much of a sci-fi fan so I don't particularly enjoy movies about space when they're too complicated and technical, but THE MAN WHO FELL TO EARTH is written in such a simple, but meaningful way- unlike most films nowadays- that makes it ageless, even after 30 years it cannot be considered outdated. Another thing I admire about it is a certain touchy feeling it has; it's hard to explain as it's so surreal, something out of this world! The first time I saw it, I was left with a sense of confusion and melancholy even, without consciously knowing why. I can't rally say I completely understand it to this day because there are so many hidden messages and feelings that make each time I watch it a whole new experience!
Despite my being a Bowie (super-) fan, I think everyone looking for a new experience in an interesting, smart and thought provoking, non-linear film should definitely buy the special edition DVD! It's worth every penny because it's a movie you can't just watch once, the VHS edition does not do it justice and the 2nd disc offers a very interesting and helpful 'Watching The Alien' documentary!


The Man Who Fell to Earth (Special Edition)
Released in DVD by Anchor Bay Entertain (11 February, 2003)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Nicolas Roeg
Starring: David Bowie, Rip Torn, and Candy Clark
While other films directed by Nicolas Roeg have attained similar cult status (including Walkabout and Don't Look Now), none has been as hotly debated as this languid but oddly fascinating adaptation of the science fiction novel by Walter Tevis. David Bowie plays the alien of the title, who arrives on Earth with hopes of finding a way to save his own planet from turning into an arid wasteland. He funds this effort by capitalizing on several highly lucrative inventions, and in so doing becomes the powerful leader of an international corporate conglomerate. But his success has negative consequences as well--his contact with Earth has a disintegrating effect that sends him into a tailspin of disorientation and metaphysical despair. The sexual attention of a cheerful young woman (Candy Clark) doesn't do much to change his outlook, and his introduction to liquor proves even more devastating, until, finally, it looks as though his visit to Earth may be a permanent one. The Man Who Fell to Earth is definitely not for every taste--it's a highly contemplative, primarily visual experience that Roeg directs as an abstract treatise on (among other things) the alienating effects of an over-commercialized society. Stimulating and hypnotic or frightfully dull, depending on your receptiveness to its loosely knit ideas, it's at least in part about not belonging, about being disconnected from the world--about being a stranger in a strange land when there's really no place like home. --Jeff Shannon.
Average review score:

Die Hard Fans Only
First off, let me say that I am a huge Bowie fan, owning and loving all of his original albums. But I simply did not enjoy this movie. Not at all really.
The story itself is neat, but it takes, well, a paragraph to describe (which I'll let you read in other reviews), and then you've got it. There's nothing more to it, there are no plot twists, nothing amazing or new. The movie moves so slow, it seems to go on for hours, and it's never exciting, just boring.
The acting from all performers in the movie is just fine, but the way the movie was put together is pretty bad. The script is barely there at all, the cinematography is dull and unoriginal, the alien design seems much older than it is, and doesn't impress. There's also a lot of sex in this movie, which I have no objections to, but it's put together in such odd ways, and never really makes sense that it's in there.
To put it simply, I guarantee you that if this movie didn't have David Bowie it wouldn't be remembered at all. The only thing neat about this movie is that I saw where the cover for "Station to Station" and "Low" came from. Sadly, you're really not missing anything, but if you're a huge fan like me, you'll have to see it for yourself.

Nicholas Roeg at his best
It's a shame that only 5 stars can be given to this classic film.
David Bowie, whom I adore anyway, makes an excellent debut in this superb film.

The film follows Walter Tevis's novel very well and adapts to the screen to create a very saddening tale of corporate America and how it can be a boon or a bust to some, including aliens.

That alone is a scary thought.

Upon his arrival from a dying planet, Thomas Jerome Newton sets out to create an empire to obtain money to purchase water for his dying planet. Occasional scenes are shown of him leaving his wife and children behind, and throughout the film we see other scenes of them waiting for his return.

What is never shown is how he is going to transport this to his home planet.

Along the way to his path to success, he is plagued by metaphorical leeches who will do anything to stop him. Greed, lust, and several other deadly sins are thrust upon our protaganist as he tries in vain to overcome them in the process.

David Bowie was the perfect person to be cast for this movie. He moves along in it with an icy perfection that is or was appropriate to his character at the time.

Keep in mind, this film is not without it's flaws. Some scenes were restored to make this the original theatrical release. One involving Rip Torn and his student could have been done without as it makes no sense and attributes nothing to the overall affect of the movie. Again, that is just an opinion, and die hard fans of this movie will be happy that it is included.

This film, upon it's release, was well ahead of its time and to this day, many of the themes implied still are appropiate to what constitutes success vs. failure in the American business sense.

The films ends on a saddening note, however, and should be a reminder that what goes around, comes around. You do not have to be a fan of David Bowie to appreciate this film, he just makes it all work and the end result is stunning. Nicholas Roeg did everything possible to steer away from the persona of David Bowie and his music. The end result is a very good solid acting part on his behalf. Ironically, some of the incidental music later became working pieces on David Bowie's LOW album, which has a stunning shot from the movie. Highly recommended, and not for anyone looking for a quick plot or storyline and a happy ending, this film is chock full of storylines and plots that keeps you interested throughtout it's prescence.

A Special Experience
Many may call it dull and disjointed, too abstract or just give it a pass, since they haven't heard of it anyway! But they'd be missing a great movie, a unique and intellectual work of art. And that it is. I myself have never been much of a sci-fi fan so I don't particularly enjoy movies about space when they're too complicated and technical, but THE MAN WHO FELL TO EARTH is written in such a simple, but meaningful way- unlike most films nowadays- that makes it ageless, even after 30 years it cannot be considered outdated. Another thing I admire about it is a certain touchy feeling it has; it's hard to explain as it's so surreal, something out of this world! The first time I saw it, I was left with a sense of confusion and melancholy even, without consciously knowing why. I can't rally say I completely understand it to this day because there are so many hidden messages and feelings that make each time I watch it a whole new experience!
Despite my being a Bowie (super-) fan, I think everyone looking for a new experience in an interesting, smart and thought provoking, non-linear film should definitely buy the special edition DVD! It's worth every penny because it's a movie you can't just watch once, the VHS edition does not do it justice and the 2nd disc offers a very interesting and helpful 'Watching The Alien' documentary!


Below
Released in DVD by Buena Vista Home Entertainment (11 March, 2003)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: David Twohy
Starring: Bruce Greenwood and Matthew Davis
Inspired by the vintage thrillers of Val Lewton and Jacques Tourneur, Below is a superbly crafted spookfest primed for cult-favorite status. As he did with The Arrival and Pitch Black, director David Twohy revitalizes a B-movie staple--in this case, the World War II submarine thriller--by turning it into a nerve-wracking funhouse of smoke and mirrors, where chilling visions tease the brain and stir paranoia among a close-knit group of terrified characters. When a U.S. sub takes on three survivors from a sinking British ship, its captain (Bruce Greenwood) uncovers secrets while concealing his own. As the sub's recent history unfolds, its crew is increasingly haunted by ghostly images, fleeting and subliminal, while the threat of German attack looms ominously overhead. More of a mood piece than a truly satisfying thriller, Below favors tense atmosphere over cohesive plotting, but it's so visually captivating, and so tautly acted by a fine ensemble cast, that its narrative flaws are easily forgiven. --Jeff Shannon
Average review score:

boring but a good cast selection
I wasnt that great watching this movie but a great cast was ensembled here but they are wasted and the movie goes deeper below. Bruce Greenwood, Dexter Flectcher, Olivia Williams, Jason Flemyng, Matthew Davis and the awesomely hilarious but wasted Zach Galifianakis as Weird Wally star. its not that horrible but it got boring after awhile and somewhat perdictable

A decent and creepy ghost story
When a US submarine is ordered to pick up survivors from an attack during WWII, eerie things start to happen on board the sub. Crew members start to hear whispering voices or to see things. The sub mysteriously changes its course which can't be corrected. But, something's up with the officers. What exactly are they hiding from the rest of the crew?

This is a very effective ghost story with great visual effects, a few gorey death scenes, and just an overall creepy atmosphere. You get the sense of being trapped in the submarine, with its cramped quarters and tempers on edge, the periods of complete silence, and even suffer along with the crew when a German ship drops explosives all around them. (A visually great sequence, too.) Some of the dialogue is a bit cheesy and some of the performances just manage to go overboard (no pun intended). But the visuals and the story more than make up for that.

The picture quality of the DVD is fantastic, very crisp and clear. Soudn quality is very good, too. Not a lot of extras, but the deleted scenes are worth watching. (I even prefer the "Red Flare Ending" to the original.)

A cult following beckons.
To be honest even though Below is not anywhere near a 5 star movie, I am going to give it that special treatment because it is streaks and bounds ahead of horror films that are currently been made these days.

Director David Twohy (Pitch Black) directs a script that Darren Aronofsky (Pi) has had his hand in to bring us a smart and downright frightening movie about a haunted submarine during WWII. Forget that pile of MTV Junk "Ghost Ship" and watch this vehicle instead.

The story is a simple one but there are plenty of twists, plot and scares along the way. Basically a submarine called the Tiger Shark is given orders to head back the way it came to pick up survivors that are drifting in the sea. After they do, strange mysterious things start happening on board the submarine while at the same time it is trying to evade the detection of a German destroyer. As the story moves forward you start to learn that everybody is keeping some sort of a secret and that there is a connection between some crew members and the haunting. Bad guys turn good and good guys turn bad and as a suspense piece you never know what is going to happen next. There are plenty of times in the film when you genuinely want to cover your eyes, or hide behind the sofa.

The other great thing about this movie is that it is crammed full of supporting actors in lead roles and you will have a lot of fun trying to put some of these faces to pictures that you have seen recently (Fight Club - Lock Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Training Day... to name but a few.) The special effects are actually well done and even though a huge percentage of the special effects are CGI you will be hard pressed to notice it. In my opinion, this is a better submarine movie than the recent U-751 and a lot more suspense driven that I actually expected.

It is odd that Dimension films did very little in way of actually promoting this film. Maybe they felt that the story was not coherent or believable enough as a horror yarn to merit much advertising.. but then again we are talking about the same company that brought us the absolutely awful Dracula 2000 (with two sequels in the pipeline!). Okay the story does bend the rules of reality here and there but the acting is solid, the story is original and it looks visually wonderful enough to cast any flaws aside.

If there is any submarine horror movie that you would like to see then make it this one (probably the only one) and if you have seen this movie at the DVD rental store but don't know what to do with it, then get it next time because you will be in for quite a pleasant surprise.

It is rather very good after all is said and done. In fact I am now going to buy myself a copy of this little gem.


Rollerball
Released in DVD by Mgm/Ua Studios (05 June, 2001)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Norman Jewison
Starring: James Caan and John Houseman
In the year 2018, violence and crime have been totally eliminated from society and given outlet in the brutal blood sport of rollerball, a high-velocity blend of football, hockey, and motor-cross racing sponsored by the multinational corporations that now control the world following the collapse of traditional politics. James Caan plays Jonathan E., the reigning superstar of rollerball, whose corporate controllers fear that Jonathan's popularity has endowed him with too much power. They begin to pressure him according to their own ruthless set of rules, but Jonathan has rules of his own--the rules of a man determined to retain his soul in a world gone mad. As directed by Norman Jewison (who was enjoying a peak of success during the early and mid-1970s), Rollerball creates a believable society that's been rendered passive and compliant by the homogenization of corporate dictatorships, where the control and flow of information is the only currency of any importance. It's a world in which natural human aggressions have been sublimated and vented through the religious fervor toward rollerball and its players. Rollerball now looks like one of those 1970s science fiction films (another example being Logan's Run) that seems a bit dated and quaint, but its ideas are still provocative and fascinating, and the production is visually impressive. The DVD includes full-screen and widescreen versions of the film, audio commentary by director Norman Jewison, a behind-the-scenes featurette, an interactive "rollergame," trivia, and production notes. --Jeff Shannon
Average review score:

Great 70s Science Fiction, Horrible Commentary
"Rollerball" is one of the great science fiction movies of the seventies, the kind big, cautionary distopian flicks they used to make before Star Wars came along and pushed the genre into the world of fantasy ("Omega Man" and "Soylent Green" being two others in this league). While cheezy in a way that only the seventies can be (the old-fashioned "futuristic" computer-font letters and numbers everywhere are great), the film still raises questions as well as instilling gut-thrills.

This DVD edition is good--for the price. The movie has not been restored by any means, but seeing it widescreen for the first time in a long time is a treat. The vintage promo "making of" documentary is of the classic mold, deep voiced narrator and all.
BUT Norman Jewison's commentary track is absolutely worthless; a prime example of the worst kind of blah blah commentary there is. This is the kind with a LOT of silent time. When he does talk, the guy can't even seem to get the words out ("Uh.....uh....this....uhhh...). And if he does get the words out, he usually just tells us what's happening on the screen (something we can obviously see for ourselves, given that this isnt' a radio play). Or he pontificates endlessly on the film's themes, explaining them as though we're all to stupid to understand the "individual v the corporate" storyline. Mention it, sure, but Norman, we don't have to be told for twenty minutes! Damn!
The only worse commentary I've heard was Kinka Usher's on the "Mystery Men" dvd. But at least that revealed something of interest--that the self-impressed Usher didn't have a talented bone in his body.
Directors who are not natural raccontours should be paired with (or replaced by) film historians on commentary tracks, the better to pull out of them the interesting stuff we know they must have in their heads. Not everyone is a John Carpenter or Larry Cohen, two of the best at this there are, no matter what you think of their films.

Anyway, Rollerball is still worth 8 or 9 bucks. Buy it.

Better than the remake.
Lot of action....good for the time period. If youve seen it before then hey, why not, go ahead and buy it. See if I care.

"This was never meant to be a game! Never!"
The rollerball game of the future was created for a special reason. "To show the futility of individual effort." To make anyone that wants to go his own way, bow dowm to the powers that be. James Cann, in one of his best roles, is Johnathan E, rollerball's super star. He's relaxed and friendly off the track, and a determined gladiator on.

The action is great and strangly hypnotizing as skaters and motorcyclists race around a large circular track, trying to throw a steel metal ball into a basket.

John Housman makes one of the best establishment heavys as he hints, demands, and threatens Johnathan to retire. For people that like gladiator movies, sports action, or the lone man trying to survive, Rollerball will excite you. You'll be shouting Johnathan's name along with the crowd. And after it's over, you'll feel like taking on the world. Yes, a great motivational movie as well.

Pay no attention to remake. This is the one and only "Rollerball".


King Kong vs. Godzilla
Released in DVD by Goodtimes Home Video (20 August, 1998)
MPAA Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Director: Ishirô Honda
Starring: Ishirô Honda, Tadao Takashima, Kenji Sahara, and Yu Fujiki
Average review score:

LIZARD AND MONKEY SHOWDOWN...
I was frustrated by this movie as a kid. I was 8 years old, and even then, I knew that Kong had no real chance against Godzilla. I mean, the big lizard's atomic fire-breath should have made this a very short film! Instead, King Kong (who was killed by mere airplanes in his original feature) slugs it out with a confused, dopey version of our favorite giant reptile. Even as a kid I knew that Godzilla was 400 feet tall and Kong was supposed to be 30 feet at best (I know, I know, I shouldn't aply logic or continuity to this, but it bugs me)! I also had problems with the fact that both creatures died horrible, irreversible deaths in their original movies. AAAAARGG!! Anyway, if you've got kids or can still suspend disbelief, this is a good way to waste an afternoon...

Bubble gum for the eyes.
This is the second best Godzilla film in the entire series.
The first has always been Godzilla vs. The Thing.
This is the kind of movie that is best enjoyed on a cold winters night and a huge bowl of popcorn. It is far one of Toho Studios most ambitious productions. The set designs, costumes and miniature effects are superior for that time period and have a great look.
The film offers great action sequences, interesting characters and just the right touches of humor,slapstick and fun.
This is the kind of monster movie that was made at a time when studios didnt have to dump millions of dollars on special effects and actors salaries.
The simplistic look to this film only adds to its charm and that is why this film has endured now for over 40 years.

this movie is good for all godzilla fans
king kong got what he deserved for stepping in godzilla's territory tokyo is godzilla's domain and in my opinion godzilla won that fight cause kong knew he was beat thats why he retreated back to farrell island and thats all i got to say about that


Related Subjects: Family Movie Review Academic_Papers Africa Agriculture Alchemy Alternative American_Studies Ancient_Egypt Anomalous_People Anthropology Asia Astronomy Biology Carter,_Howard Central_America Chemistry Chupacabra Cognitive_Science Communication Conferences Contractors_and_Consultants Criticism_of_Darwinism Demography_and_Population_Studies Earth_Sciences Economics Education Educational_Resources Employment Environment Ethnic_Relations Ethnic_Studies Europe Family_and_Consumer_Science Flat_Earth Forensic_Science Geography Geology,_Alternative Guidelines_and_Codes History Hoaxes Institutions Instruments_and_Supplies Ireland Jersey_Devil Language_and_Linguistics Mariette,_Auguste Math Methods_and_Techniques Middle_East Mothman North_America Oceania Periods_and_Cultures Physics Political_Science Potassium-Argon_Dating Psychology Public_Administration Publications Recreation_and_Leisure_Studies Reference Rural_Sociology Science_and_Technology_Policy Software South_America South_Pacific_Studies Survey Technology The_Philadelphia_Experiment Theses_and_Abstracts Tools Topics Voynich_Manuscript
More Pages: Science Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53