Seneca Movie Reviews


Related Subjects: Language_and_Linguistics
Family movie reviews for "Seneca" sorted by average review score:

The Verdict
Released in DVD by Fox Home Entertainme (04 June, 2002)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Sidney Lumet
Starring: Paul Newman and Charlotte Rampling
In this 1982 courtroom drama written by David Mamet and directed by Sidney Lumet, Paul Newman found the perfect role for a transitional period of his stellar career. As alcoholic Boston lawyer Frank Galvin, Newman shook off his screen persona as a handsome, blue-eyed hunk to portray an aging, weary man whose best years are behind him, with a shot-glass future that looks very bleak indeed. But when Galvin is given a chance to redeem himself--by proving medical negligence in the case of a comatose woman--he makes one final effort to regain his self-respect and tarnished reputation. He's an underdog against formidable odds, facing a powerful, politically connected lawyer (James Mason, slick as ever) who will do anything to win his case, regardless of professional ethics. Further complicating matters is a woman (Charlotte Rampling) who only appears to be worthy of Galvin's trust and love, until Galvin's best friend and colleague (Jack Warden) proves otherwise. Excellent as both courtroom drama and riveting character study, the film crackles with Mamet's sharp dialogue; and Lumet's direction is a brilliant example of forceful restraint. The film gave Newman one of the best roles of his career; many felt he deserved the Oscar (he lost to Ben Kingsley in Gandhi) that would belatedly be given to Newman for The Color of Money. Along with Hud, Cool Hand Luke, and Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid, The Verdict ranks highly as a signature performance by one of America's all-time greatest actors. --Jeff Shannon
Average review score:

Newman and Mason clash in Oscar nominated roles
Sidney Lumet was fortunate that Paul Newman was giving one of the best performances of his distinguished career in front of the camera on "The Verdict," because this 1982 courtroom drama has a fatal flaw that might othrwise have sunk the film. I do not know if the fault lies with David Mamet's screenplay or Barry Reed's original novel, but one of them is definitely the guilty party in this film that otherwise features a steallar script and grand performances from a veteran cast.

Newman, in an Oscar nominated role, is Frank Galvin, a cynical and alcoholic ambulance chaser who is tossed a bone by old friend Mickey Morrissey (Jack Warden) in the form of a personal injury suit. A young woman went into a hospital, owned by the Roman Catholic Church, was given the wrong anesthetic, became comatose, and is never coming back. The idea is that Frank will do the paperwork, accept the settlement offer, and go back to sinking into oblivion. But circumstances convince him to get his day in court and go for broke.

One of the key dyanmics of this film is that even as Galvin has sunk so low as a lawyer, his opponent, Ed Concannon (James Mason, also deservedly nominated for an Oscar) represents one of the most corrupt large corporate law films in film history. Concanno will literally do everything possible to defend his client, as we see over the course of the film. Clearly the goal for Concanno is not justice but victory, while for Galvin the two become one in the same. Mason's performance is as strong as Newman's, mainly because Mamet has written some great scenes for each actor's character. But then, think of what is involved to make Newman the underdog in a major Hollywood movie.

The flaw in the movie comes when we learn that while Concanno has an army of associates as well as a large law firm and the weight of the local archdioesce behind him, Galvin might actually have the truth on his side. The case comes down to the claim of a proverbial last minute surprise witness as to what "really" happened and exactly what was the mistake that made the young woman brain dead. This becomes more than a case of contradictory testimony but one of contradictory records as well. At this point the every ready Concanno pulls out the appropriate legal precedent to have the piece of evidence thrown out. The judge agrees, Galvin throws a fit, and the verdict comes down to what sort of an empassioned speech our heroes gives in his closing.

The only problem is that the rule is wrong, and even viewers whose legal background consists of several seasons of "L.A. Law," "Law & Order," "The Practice" or even "Ally McBeal" can probably spot the flaw in the judge's reasoning. Even if they cannot come up with a sound legal basis for overturning the ruling, they will recognize on a fundamental level that this is just not right. I have every reason to believe that the twelves jurors true sitting in judgment of the case recognize the sense of injustice as well and just might have their minds made up before Galvin's closing argument.

Granted, most viewers are probably not as offended by this plot device as I am, especially given the mesmirizing performances of Newman and Mason. But I cannot get away from the idea that the flaw robs Newman of his climactic moment. Given the facts of the case there might not be any way around that particular legal predicament, but that would be a crime of a different nature.

Newman was robbed!
I saw this movie when it was released in the theaters ( yes, I am that old! ), and it remains among the best courtroom dramas and character studies ever made.
Jack Warden, James Mason and Charlotte Rampling are all flawlessly great, but Paul Newman was BRILLIANT playing the ambulance-chasing turned righteously indignant Frank Galvin ( the scene where he is photographing his client in the hospital! his meeting with the archdiocese! his return to his apartment after the judge refuses his request for a delay! Newman's best and most emotionally exposed acting ever ). I still refuse to see "Ghandi" because of the resentment I feel over the choice of Ben Kingsley for Oscar's best actor when THIS WAS THE ROLE FOR WHICH NEWMAN SHOULD HAVE WON!!
Nobody I have ever known , seeing this movie for the first time, fails to be riveted to the screen during the final ten minutes.

best movie ever made
because this film deals with the reality of reality...newman as frank galvin says to the jury, today you are the truth..not symbols of freedom or aspirations of liberty, but the real thing...you will decide what is just...and so, this film is not only about doctors and malpractice..it's about the nobility of man's spirit overcoming deception and lies.. ..it deals with human character and the ability to climb from the ashes; to identify and choose the high road..and anyone who belittles james mason's performance as cocky counselor just doesn't get it...this movie is not overrated..it's underrated until it becomes recognized as the greatest movie ever written, acted, and filmed... .it's an inexorable hunt for the truth identifying those paths of glory that lead but to the grave.


Mississippi Masala
Released in DVD by Columbia Tristar Hom (27 May, 2003)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Mira Nair
Starring: Denzel Washington and Sarita Choudhury
Mira Nair, the Indian director, scored an international art-house hit with her feature debut, Salaam Bombay!, a tale of life in the streets of seething urban India. Her next film was a surprising turnabout: Mississippi Masala is a cultural study and a love story set in the rural American south. The love story comes courtesy of Denzel Washington, as a rug cleaner, and Sarita Choudhury (from Nair's Kama Sutra), as the daughter of Indian immigrants running a small-time motel; both give fresh, charming performances. But Nair is equally interested in capturing the feelings of an exile's life, and Roshan Seth, the fine actor who played Nehru in Gandhi, superbly catches the hope and sorrow of dislocation. Although the issues are serious, Nair maintains a breezy, naturalistic approach, and the various ingredients of this masala blend into a rich, flavorful stew. --Robert Horton
Average review score:

BACK WHEN MIRA NAIR WAS STILL A TRUE FILMMAKER
What a brilliant piece of low-key, realistic movie making, from the days when Mira Nair was making in your face movies such as Salaam Bombay and Mississipi Masala.

The first thing admirable about it is Nair's ability to merge three cultures (Uganda, India, & Southern American) into an enchanting love story. An Indian family of a man, his wife and their young daughter Mina are expelled from Uganda under the reign of dictator Amin. The family eventually moves to the U.S. When Mina grows up she finds herself caught in a curious cultural twist and considers herself a mix "masala". She later falls in love with a black carpet cleaner (played immaculately by Denzil) only to stir up a hornet's nest in her family, culture and community.

The movie is from 1992, so the mild racism undercurrent may be a bit tired but wasn't when it came out, in fact most of the ironies (e.g., both the lovers are "colored" in different shades) are shown in a light-hearted and dignified manner.

The movie has a clutch of hilarious moments as well, which make it an all round fun movie to watch. Both the protagonists, Denzil as the southern man and Sarita Chaudhari as the Indian woman, are actually quite likeable characters and you end up caring about both of them.

A very wholesome treat to watch!

Something for everyone
I'm a big fan of Denzel, and all reviewers are right about the quality and sensuality of the love story that is central to this movie. And where else will most of us get to see Denzel do "The Electric Slide?" But...having said that, I found that the love story was the least interesting thing about this movie! I was fascinated to learn about the Indian culture in the South (and I have seen the "American owned" signs on motels in the South, an obvious attempt to attract patrons who don't want to stay at an Indian owned motel). The deep pain of exile felt by the father was the most moving element to me. I felt moved to tears at several points, and at the end. As a Jew, I identified very strongly with the father's and family's distress at being forcibly and violently evicted from home based on racial and ethnic hatred. A wonderful film.

Entertaining and thoughtful
This film is a wonderfully acted, directed and scripted parable on the power of love to overcome racial and ethnic divisions, filled with humor, insight, pathos and inspiration, and which completely avoids the trap of becoming preachy.
One of its particularly interesting insights for me was its take on the polarizing nature of black-white racial divisions in this country. This is shown not only by the negative reaction of the local Indian community in this small Mississippi town to the romance of one of its women by a black man, but, even more revealingly, by the response of the local whites, which results in the bank calling in its loan on Denzel Washington's carpet cleaning business, along with the loss of his white clientele. Even though the relationship in question is between two dark skinned people, the whites react to this as though the Indian woman is white; in otherwords, vis a vis blacks, if you are not black you are white.
I strongly recommend this movie.


School Daze
Released in DVD by Columbia Tri-Star (30 January, 2001)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Spike Lee
Starring: Laurence Fishburne and Giancarlo Esposito
Spike Lee's follow-up to his unlikely hit She's Gotta Have It was this ambitious--some would say too ambitious--attempt at a musical about college life. But Lee, ever the provocateur, doesn't settle for a simple college comedy. Rather, he wants to make a point about the social divisions within all-black colleges: between the socializers and the socially conscious, and between light and dark-skinned blacks. Laurence Fishburne plays a politically aware student trying to bring his fellow students together; Giancarlo Esposito plays the fraternity boss who constantly seeks to insert a wedge between the haves and have-nots. Lee himself plays a pawn in the middle, a would-be frat boy undergoing a wicked Hell Week as a pledge. The story doesn't pull together and the musical numbers--more spoof than anything else--only serve to fragment it. While it offers interesting points, it never does so in a particularly cohesive way. --Marshall Fine
Average review score:

Entertaining!!
This definitely was one of Spike's weaker joint's. Though it was refreshing to see entertaining musical numbers in his film. Once again, race is the topic. However he concentrates on black America's preoccupation with light and dark skin. At the end of the film, you're bound to get into a conversation about it. That's the one thing Spike wants, a deep conversation about what we can do to improve relations with each other.

Getting to the Root of Yesterday's and Today's Problems
I have to totally disagree with the editorial review stating the movie doens't come together. The movie does come together speaking of divisions on different planes. Whether it's on the campus of an HBCU or urban city, people of color have come across that division of "wannabees" & "jigaboos". In so many movies, we point our fingers at "them" for not treating us as equals but this movie made us to forcible point at ourselves. It made us look at how we discriminate among ourselves that white is right and black in bad. What is the real purpose of sororities & fraternities. We need to be reminded why HBCUs were built - because we couldn't attend elsewhere because of discrimination - yet we discriminate ourselves. Spike is reminding us to not become lulled into a deep sleep with material trappings (cars, jewelry, etc.) and wake up to reality. We can't stand together if divided among ourselves. I highly recommend this movie. It also allows you to see stars in their early years. I also cherish scenes of the late Phyllis Hyman.

Brings Back Memories!
I saw this film when I was in fifth grade elementary school. It was great seeing it again especially after the black college experience. Mission College...hmm I was there in Atlanta, in "the bottom" and I actually went to the KFC where Samuel L. Jackson's encountered. Brilliant performances by all characters especially at the step show. A must have dvd!


Tarzan in Manhattan
Released in DVD by Simitar Video (03 February, 1998)
MPAA Rating: NR (Not Rated)
Director: Michael Schultz
Starring: Joe Lara and Kim Crosby
Average review score:

In the Tarzan movie tradition
For a true Edgar Rice Burroughs fan this one misses it once again but we have grown to expect that from Hollywood. However, if you enjoyed the campy old-time Tarzan movies, this one is just for you. The "Jane" in this movie is not the typical as expected in the role. She is a New York city cab driver and breathes some fresh air into the rather stale stereotyped role. The writing and the acting is B movie grade but it is a fun one for the kids with nothing you need to screen. If you are looking for serious cinema, go somewhere else. But for fun, family entertainment in the old time Tarzan movie tradition, try this one out.

Funny!
I really liked this light hearted movie, part serious part comedy. Makes one wonder whose more civilized, New Yorkers or Tarzan. Best bets on Tarzan. Great first role for Joe. Jane was hysterical, as was Archemedes Porter played by Tony Curtis.We should all have fathers as protective as he is.Seeing Cheeta drive the cab was a hoot! Jungle comedy in da big city.A must see for seeing a light hearted ape man.


The Evil That Men Do
Released in DVD by Columbia Tri-Star (19 March, 2002)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: J. Lee Thompson
Average review score:

what do i remember about THE EVIL THAT MEN DO?
i am trying not to remember much of this disgusting actioner with bronson looking somber and wooden as an agent or a hitman lured out of retirement and tracking down a sadistic doctor in south america. i remember the gruesome opening sequence of torture where some guy is tied up and having his, um, i am thinking of an anatomically G rated term---lower portions getting shock treatment (his back toward the camera but still...gross)? ugh. i also remember bronson living on an island saying hi to a fish named quasimodo. i also know of bronson beating up a tall indian in a bar and doing something to his, um, lower portion. i also remember theresa saldana sadly wasted here. i also recall the film's ugly bloody climax ... i do know all this sick violent stuff is in THE EVIL THAT MEN DO. you are better off seeing earlier charles bronson material ...

Absolutely Brutal Bronson Actioner
Charles Bronson passed away recently, and to remember him I decided to view once again one of his most bizarre films, "The Evil That Men Do." Returning to this film at least ten years after I last watched it was quite the trip down memory lane, back to the invigorating 1980s when low budget films like this played on cable every night. Some of the best B-movie action flicks in that era starred Bronson, who worked closely with companies like Cannon in order to bring us numerous sequels in his "Death Wish" franchise, the gruesome "10 to Midnight," and the immensely unentertaining "Assassination." Of course, Bronson was much more than a string of cheesy actioners in the 1980s; he also appeared in some of the best known films of all time, like "The Dirty Dozen," "Once Upon a Time in the West," and "Chino." Bronson's death at the age of eighty-one means we will never see a new Charles Bronson film, but at least we have plenty of great films to remember him by. I will miss him.

"The Evil That Men Do" may not be one of Bronson's best roles, but it certainly ranks as one of his seediest. In this sleazy production, Bronson plays a retired assassin named Holland living out his days on the Cayman Islands. Life looks good until an old friend arrives on the island looking to lure Holland back into business again. This friend, Hector Lomelin (played by Jose Ferrer) brings with him a mountain of videotaped testimony in which an endless string of people relate personal accounts of the most repulsive tortures inflicted upon them and their families. One name repeatedly appears in these accounts: The Doctor, specifically Dr. Clement Molloch, a demented physician who dedicates his life to instructing petty despots in desolate Central American countries about the intricacies of mental and physical torture. In fact, the movie begins with a lengthy scene of the doctor's work, as he teaches a group of military officials in Surinam how to put out the lights on those pesky political opponents who always complain about such irritating things as elections, civil rights, and due process of law. Holland eventually agrees to exterminate the doctor in the name of human decency; he even refuses to accept a fee for hunting down this aberrant creature.

Holland heads to Central America to track down Molloch, but in order to allay any suspicions from the doctor and his gang of bodyguards, he brings along Rhiana Hildalgo (Theresa Saldana) and her daughter to pose as his wife and child. Hildalgo's husband died at the hands of Clement Molloch, so she ostensibly wants to see his memory avenged. Holland and his "family" meet up with Max Ortiz, a guy who hates despotic regimes and their reliance on Molloch as a political weapon. With Ortiz supplying the information on the doctor's whereabouts, Holland starts knocking off the hired help. He kills one of the bodyguards by flinging a knife into his throat, hangs another one with a fire hose, shotguns a couple of baddies, and kidnaps Molloch's seamy sister in order to lure the doctor into the line of fire. Along the way, Holland runs into problems with Paul Briggs, a U.S. embassy official who kowtows to Molloch and his goons. In a film loaded with atrocity piled on atrocity, the ending is nauseating to watch, as Molloch gets his comeuppance at the hands of a group of peasants who remember him only too well.

"The Evil That Men Do" is one sick puppy of a movie. It's difficult to picture Bronson starring in such a tacky movie, but nearly all of Bronson's efforts in the 1980s depicted him as a vengeful entity mowing down the bad guys in increasingly sadistic ways. This film is no different, except that nearly every character (even the supposed good guys) leaves a bad taste in your mouth. To make matters worse, the script is so full of holes that you could sail a fleet of battleships through it. How could Molloch's bodyguard think Holland was anything but trouble after spotting him glaring at Molloch during that sporting event? And what was up with the weird recognition between Cannell and Holland in the village café? Maybe I slipped into a coma while watching the movie, but I don't remember any background about these two characters knowing each other from some other place and time. I also never grasped the reasons why Holland decided to accept the mission after some initial reluctance. He watched several of Lomelin's tapes without batting an eye, and adamantly refuses to assassinate the doctor. Then suddenly he decides to lend a hand. Why? I don't know because it's never explained clearly. It's problems like these that handicap "The Evil That Men Do."

The DVD version does contain the uncut version of the film, or at least it appears so. The first segment is really a doozy, and it sets the tone for the monstrous activities to follow. Unfortunately, the only extras on the disc are three trailers: one for this film, one for "The Replacement Killers," and one for "The Big Hit." At least the picture quality is quite good for such an old, low budget film. Maybe watching this slightly above average Bronson film isn't the best way to pay homage to the man, but it is a good representation of the movies Chuck churned out in the 1980s. After you work your way through the "Death Wish" films, you will need to see "The Evil That Men Do" in order to attain the rank of a Bronson completist.

........Lives On And Ooooooooooon!
Bronson's back, kids! This time his sights are set on a sadistic doctor of torture(as opposed to unsadistic doctors of torture) in South America. Bronson's an ex-hitman who's comes out of retirement(naturally) to take out an evil brute known as "The Doctor." Scared yet? You will be when you see Bronson and his "wife" try to pass themselves off as swingers to one of The Doctor's goons. Bronson may be old, but he kicks some butt in this one(as usual) and kills anyone who gets in his way. This is what entertainment is about.


The Blob
Released in DVD by Columbia/Tristar Studios (06 August, 2002)
MPAA Rating: R (Restricted)
Director: Chuck Russell
Starring: Shawnee Smith and Donovan Leitch

Related Subjects: Language_and_Linguistics