Forensic Science Movie Reviews
More Pages: Forensic Science Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87


The Cost Says It!

A programmers nightmare
Consider the opening credits--a naked blonde dances in slo-mo, languidly running her slender fingers over her--well, let's just say that what we're supposed to get from this dance solo is that the aliens are intrigued by the sensual possibilities of assuming human form. O-o-kay.... In any event, the premise here is that aliens have chosen Earth as their next target for invasion; quite naturally, they've decided that Southern California provides the optimum beachhead.
Our champion (Michael Weatherly) is one of four earthlings taken hostage aboard an orbiting space station by the alien invasion force. He and his companions have been abducted for study by an alien doctor, gamely, if not convincingly, portrayed by Isabella Hofmann. Of course, all the technical wizardry of a galaxy far, far away doesn't stand a chance against the Swiss army knife. The discerning viewer, therefore, will quickly overlook the plot to consider the deeper thematic question in The Colony--namely, why is our planet so often saved by blondes from Los Angeles? --Stephan Magcosta

A made for TV science fiction on an alien threat to Earth.

Come for the dinosaurs, stay for the laughs!In spite of it all, this movie manages to transcind itself and become funny. The fight sequences are a riot, and the special effects are as good for laughs as anything "Dark Shadows" or the original "Star Trek" ever produced. And all in all, the storyline isn't any worse than that of "Jurassic Park" or "Star Wars"; the biggest failing is the low budget and too much reliance on fight scenes to carry the action. If you're looking for a film to pass the time or entertain friends, this one will do the trick ... especially for fans of the "Soap Opera Game" or Mystery Science Theater watchers who want to see the original movie uncut.


Fun and Silly but not quite up to snuffThe Retromedia disk comes with the US and the European versions. The European version is better and more accurate, but you have to put up with Greek subtitles.
The film opens with two cryptic scenes. In one, a pair of doctors operate on a gorilla and implant a device in its head. In the other, a group of mercenaries are killed by one of their own.
From there we follow one of the mercenaries (he survived being killed) who is looking up old acquaintances in Nigeria. One is a young red-head who seems spoiled and just wants to shoot really rare animals.
Well, we get a lot of jungle footage, some hunting, lots of plot threads, intelligent gorillas attacking, a mad doctor, and the beautiful Sacred Monkey.
This is one strange film but it has its moments. I would give it a higher rating but it lacked enough cohesiveness to really make the film work.


Mind blowSorry to say but this was a real stinker. I only give it 2 stars because of Ironside and Clarence Williams...


Not as bad as the 2 star rating would indicateNo problem, it's still in space right? Well there was the second prototype in the lab of course, and it's promptly stolen by well, by some bad guys. We never really find out who they are and it doesn't matter anyway. The Department of Defense calls in Captain Mike Connors to find Viper and clean this situation up. Viper of course gets away, and of course it gets away in a small town, and Connors and crew have to chase it. That's enough plot, you get the idea.
The acting really isn't that bad with the exception of a few scenes, and the special effects were pretty good for what is essentially a made for TV movie. I really wanted to give this one 3 stars, but with the storyline holes, so-so special effects, and totally bare bones DVD I just couldn't justify it. Don't avoid it as a rental though, it is worth watching if your in the mood for a cheesy sci-fi/thriller/b-movie evening.


Faint praise. Very faint praise.The liner notes explain many of the movie's problems; there were reasons why some talented people cranked out a movie this cruddy. One of its few virtues is good acting by Gwynne (even though she hatedhatedhated the film) as the Monster's mother and Gloria Castillo as the manipulative vixen who brings about the Monster's ultimate demise.
The Monster is unscary, played by a 50-year old man in boots to make him seem taller. And nearly all of his dialogue was re-dubbed as grunts and hoots to make him seem more like a bestial killer than a thinking being. This would be okay, except for the fact that sometimes he CAN talk reasonably well, just because the script needs him to convey a point. I could buy the dubious idea that the women close to him understood his gibberish, but the inconsistency grated on me.
Added to these glaring inconsistencies are the movie's stagnant direction and lack of creepy atmospherics. The sum total is kind of a bore.
A side note- It is called Meteor Monster almost everywhere on the web, but goes by its alternate title of Teenage Monster on the cover. This is somehow strangely fitting, as many of the people involved with this movie probably hope it stays hidden.
The DVD transfer is excellent. Trailers include Teenagers From Space, Robot Monster, Carnival of Souls, Giant From the Unknown, and Cosmic Man. They are the best part of the disc.


big pile o' crap
Don"t even think of watching it
Still waiting for the definitive "1st Mission to Mars" film!I want to see a film that accurately conveys the build-up to the start of the mission, the duration of the trip there, the landing and the possible completion of objectives (whether disasters occur in a film or not is completely up to the creator of the film... I like looking at the possibilities), and possibly the trip home. Sadly, I am looking for all of this in each Mars film that comes out, and I feel that the best efforts are ruined by characters that fall flat so much of the time. However, I am inclined to take what I can from each film that I see. I love the thought of humans going to Mars, so I'll keep watching mediocre Mars films for as long as it takes to actually send human beings there.
The sense of isolation and a desolate Martian landscape are conveyed very well. The ending may try your patience a bit. If you love space exploration, you'll want to see "Stranded" one or two times.


Easy on the eyes, subtle as a brickAll of which is a roundabout way to say that you can't watch this movie without comparing it with either the 1980 film or with the original novel and that this version is extremely disappointing. Nuance is replaced with blatant acting and a heavy handed score, slow discoveries replaced by melodrama and all humanity reduced to the emotions of a soap opera.
While it's obvious that many changes would have to be made in order to turn a fairly cerebral novel into an accessible movie, the changes made to this are extremely disappointing and I couldn't recommend this movie to anyone on any level. Leave it well enough alone and hope you can find either the 1980 movie or, preferably, the original book.
Understated adaption of a sci fi classicHaber starts out with the best intentions, but as their dream therapy sessions progress he finds himself believing Orr's fantastic claims, and temptation leads him to manipulate George's dreams for his own advancement. George soon catches on to what his doctor is doing, confronts him, and sets in motion a race not only for his own freedom but the future of humanity.
TLOH works on the level of a psychological thriller rather than action-based science fiction. A somewhat surrealistic atmosphere underlies every scene, leading us to question whether or not each incarnation of reality after Geoorge wakes may be yet another extension of his dreaming. The philosophical questions provoked by George's unique situation (Is all reality but a dream? Is Manny even a real person? Is George the defacto God of his universe?) have an unmistakable existentialist slant.
I admit to never having read the novel by Ursula K. LeGuin upon which TLOH is based. Therefore, I approached this made for cable TV adaptation with no particular expectations. I thought it was well done for what it was, although by no means could it compete with a high-budget feature film production. Still, the small cast of main actors were exceptionally well chosen for their roles: James Caan was comfortable as Dr. Haber and convinced me that he may well have been a psychologist in another life; Lukas Haas was the perfect innocent; Lisa Bonet, while playing the same character type as always, really seemed suited to the role of coolly mysterious attorney/ dream girl Heather LaLache. In all, the cheerless gray future of @ 30 years from now is realized very plausibly, mainly through set and wardrobe design, with little attempt at "sci-fi-isms" such as robot servants or aliens (which I understand made an appearance in the original version).
If you can suspend your disbelief and appreciate toned-down, philosophical science fiction, you will be able to enjoy the Lathe of Heaven.
-Andrea, aka Merribelle
not bad remake/update, decent performance, other was betterhas half way decent performances, but it's hardly as good as the
original, it's been toned down a bit, it does have an ironic twist. Lukas Haas and James Caan are fine as Orr and the doctor.
Lisa Bonet is cute as Heather. Try to check out the original though, which is a better version.
What really caused me to give this such a low rating is not the film itself, but the quality of the DVD. The source print is full of splices. And even worse, this film is in "color," as it is so proudly described on the box. However, there is so little color left in the print, that it almost looks black and white. In fact, it would have been easier to watch in black and white!