Austin Movie Reviews
More Pages: Austin Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32


Austin gets started
Stone Cold ¿ Year One: Austin vs. AdamsHere are the contents of this DVD:
THE MATCHES
1.Austin vs. "Gentlemen" Chris Adams: "Come As You Are Street Fight." Austin's first big program was his legendary feud with his trainer Chris Adams where the two men were embattled in a bizarre love triangle which involved Adam's ex-wife Jeanie Clark and his new wife Toni. This street fight was awesome. Austin's in football pads and Adam's in a judo gi. Tons of arena-sprawling action. 11 minutes. 4 stars.
2.Austin and "Missouri Tiger" Jeff Gaylord vs. Chico Torres and Frogman LeBlanc: Typical mid-card tag match. Nothing much became of the other workers. Decent action. 5 minutes. 2 stars.
3.Eric Embry and Steve Austin w/ Tojo Yamamoto vs. "Gorgeous" Gary Young and "Superstar" Bill Dundee: Embry was THE top star of the USWA in the late 80's and early 90's. Young and Dundee were stars out of the Memphis territory (which merged with World Class to form the USWA). This is a good old-school tag match. The match itself gets off to a slow start but totally picks up toward the middle to a really hot finish. Notable thing about this match: Dr. Tom Pritchard, currently a WWE official, was doing color commentary for this match. One of his quotes (paraphrased), "I'm very impressed with this rookie Austin. He'll be big one day." I don't think even Pritchard had any idea... 12 minutes. 3 ½ stars.
4."Missouri Tiger" Jeff Gaylord, Sheik Braddock and Austin w/General Skandor Akbar vs. "Gentleman" Chris Adams, "Maniac" Matt Borne and Eric Embry: Gaylord and Braddock were two USWA workers. Akbar was a top heel manager in the territory for YEARS. Borne was a prolific worker throughout the South and had a stint in WCW as Big Josh. He is probably best known though as the original Doink the Clown in the WWF. This was a solid match with tons of nice spots and great action. The crowd was very hot for this one. 12 minutes. 3 stars.
5.Recap of the Austin - Adams feud/love triangle with tons of highlights of confrontations between the two men. Highly entertaining.
6.Austin and Jeanie Clark vs. Chris and Toni Adams: Decent action with TONS of crowd heat. 10 minutes. 4 stars.
7.Austin and Jeanie Clark vs. Chris and Toni Adams: Re-match. Again tons of crowd heat and solid action. Percy Pringle (WWE's Paul Bearer) on commentary. Chris Von Erich, Jeff Jarrett and Iceman King Parsons post-match run-ins. 10 minutes. 4 stars.
THE DVD Extras
The extras on the DVD are somewhat laughable. Included on this DVD are:
1.Austin's biography (a quick paragraph or two summarizing his career and childhood).
2.An Austin photo gallery consisting of 4 pictures.
In other words, the extras are all right for a look but otherwise are worthless...
THE VERDICT:
Overall, at a cover price this DVD is a bargain. The matches and extras are a little sparse, but they are golden for wrestling nostalgists. The matches themselves are solid. The Adams - Austin feud was one of THE best storylines to come out during that era in the USWA (and wrestling in general), almost on par (though on a much smaller stage) with the subsequent (and much bigger) legendary Austin - McMahon feud of the late 90's WWF.
This DVD is definitely must viewing for Stone Cold fans/enthusiasts/completists. Fans of the WCCW/USWA circa '89/'90 will also appreciate this DVD. It is definitely recommended for anyone interested in seeing a very well-booked storyline.
Highest Recommendation.


A great first outing!
Absolutely Hilarious!
funny stuff!Vanessa is disgusted by Austin's, shall we say, randiness as they chase down the also unfrozen dr Evil. Dr Evil is united with his test tube son Scott (Seth Green), and they have a tumultuous father-son relationship, which involves going to group therapy where Scott says Dr Evil is trying to kill him, the therapist (Carrie Fishers) counsels him that it only feels that way and then Dr. Evil says "Oh no, the boy is quite astute, I AM trying to kill him."
It is just a funny wild ride, vastly enjoyable even if you didn't live in the 1960s!


Flawed but very watchable.
Welcome to Moonbase Alpha
Out of the ordinary.

WrestleMania 15 (The Climax)WMXV breakdown:
Hardcore Championship: Bob "Hardcore" Holly's legend begins with him becoming Hardcore Champion.
Tag Team Championship: Test & D'Lo Brown don't see eye-to-eye, and it shows in the match. Owen Hart & Jeff Jarrett were a solid tag team.
Big Show vs Mankind: Vince has everything in his pocket to prevent Stone Cold from becoming Champion--and Big Show screws it all up by getting himself disqualified. Show really has a falling out with the Corporation afterwards.
Intercontinental Championship: Solid match, even though Road Dogg retains gold. James is a much better tag team wrestler than singles, in my opinion, and it shows down the road.
Kane vs Triple H: After tremedous buildup, DX reunites...or so everyone thought.
Women's Championship: Sable was a dominant Women's Champ and it showed at WrestleMania XV. Is she the dominant female?
European Championship: Great effort by Shane, but match remembered for Triple H & Chyna turning heel, ending DX for 7 months.
Hell in a Cell: Probably the worst Hell in a Cell match ever, especially with Bossman being hung out to dry by the Brood.
Main Event (Rock vs Stone Cold): Match of the Night--Four refs (Mike Chioda, Tim White, Earl Hebner & Mick Foley/Mankind), Vince (and only Vince) at ringside, and the effort by both men made WrestleMania XV. This match ranks 3rd of the 3 WrestleMania matches between Austin & Rock.
Wrestlemania15is just crazy
2.Big Show vs. Mankind *** stars Big Show gets arrested
3.Owen Harts&JJ vs. D'lo&Test TagTeamTitle **stars not a good match
4.HHH Vs. Kane ****stars Real good match Dx comes back together
5.Roadog vs. Val Venis Vs. Ken Shamrock Vs. Goldust*** IC Title
Shramrock goes crazy.
6.Sable Vs. Torrie womens title **stars because of Sable's looks
7.Shane Vs. X-Pac Euopean ***stars Dx breaks up
8.Taker Vs. BIg Boss Man HIC ***stars Not Takers Best Appearance at Wrestlemania but dissent
9.Rock Vs. Austin *****stars Best match between these two
The BEST SPORTS EVENT EVER!MAIN EVENT: Steve Austin against The Rock. Who will be the Special Guest Referee? What dirty tricks will Vince McMahon have up his sleeves?
Other highlights include Undertaker against Big Bossman inside a steel cage, Sable against Tori, Butterbean against Bart Gunn boxing match, Shane McMahon against X-Pac, Big Show Paul Wight against Mankind, and many others. GREAT EVENT! BUY IT NOW!


A mystifyingly incoherent piece of filmmakingOn virtually every level this film fails, and it is not merely a film made with no skill; it is made with arrogance and hostility for elevated thought. I would argue that people who enjoy this movie probably view me as some kind of cynical deviant for denouncing this film, when really the film itself is more cynical than any criticism it provokes.
The audience is asked to follow the journey of a brilliant mathematician without ever learning about his mathematical genius. Chalkboards and math equations populate this film, but with no breadth or insight into how analytical thought processes were integral to John Nash's existence. The one example that attempts to illustrate Nash's concepts and genius involves a getting-laid scheme that is sexually crude and simplistic. It is cynical for the filmmakers to assume that audiences are only smart enough to accept the topic of mathematical genius in such a lightweight and salacious way.
The film, for those who do not know, follows John Nash from his years as a student at Princeton to his Nobel Prize win in 1994. Russell Crowe does what he can with an underwritten character. Like I said, he has no traits other than arrogant grumpiness and schizophrenic delirium. That is what is written, and Crowe cannot, despite his abilities, bring that to life. As a result, John Nash is not a sympathetic hero worthy of two hours of anyone's time. The real John Nash probably is. But not Akiva Goldsman and Ron Howard's whitewashed one-dimensional portrayal.
Blander than him though is the portrayal of Nash's wife, Alicia. She is objectified from the beginning of the film. There are at least three closeups of her buttocks and breasts with the ogling John Nash looking on in pleasure. When John and Alicia finally connect on a supposedly intellectual level, it is through a series of sexual one-upmanships. Surely there was something unique and extraordinary that connected these two people. And surely it wasn't the cleverness of their sexual innuendoes...When a rift eventually occurs in Nash's marital life, it is portrayed singularly through Nash's inability to hold an erection. What is this film's obsession with reyling on sex as a cheap mechanism?
When Nash's signs of schizophrenia escalate, the filmmakers take the position that insults not just medical science but human reason altogether. Schizophrenia happens to be a very real, harmful disease and this film, by puporting that it can be overcome without the persistent intervention of the medical and psychological community denigrates the ceaseless, tangible pain of those afflicted with it. Furthermore, schizophrenic hallucinations are portrayed as a linear action movie subplot; while dangerous, they're also highly exciting. The movie doesn't present the hallucinations through Nash's warped tv-influenced notions of saving the world; but rather through endorsing those notions with cheapo cardboard stereotypes. I think it's clear that Ron Howard would rather us be excited by the illusionary car chase at hand than Nash's own jaded vision of that car chase. In that respect, the film fails to uncover insight into his unconscious's thought processes. David Lynch's Mulholland Drive, by showing one character's dream, uncovered a whirlwind about that character that was fascinating and psychologically compelling.
I really hated this movie, and I'm sure Holden would have called it "the phoniest of the phony."
A Beautiful Movie
WowI know, I know: it's not totally factual and leaves out some important dirty laundry that the filmmakers would rather have left in the closet, but still.
It's fantastic.


A mystifyingly incoherent piece of filmmakingOn virtually every level this film fails, and it is not merely a film made with no skill; it is made with arrogance and hostility for elevated thought. I would argue that people who enjoy this movie probably view me as some kind of cynical deviant for denouncing this film, when really the film itself is more cynical than any criticism it provokes.
The audience is asked to follow the journey of a brilliant mathematician without ever learning about his mathematical genius. Chalkboards and math equations populate this film, but with no breadth or insight into how analytical thought processes were integral to John Nash's existence. The one example that attempts to illustrate Nash's concepts and genius involves a getting-laid scheme that is sexually crude and simplistic. It is cynical for the filmmakers to assume that audiences are only smart enough to accept the topic of mathematical genius in such a lightweight and salacious way.
The film, for those who do not know, follows John Nash from his years as a student at Princeton to his Nobel Prize win in 1994. Russell Crowe does what he can with an underwritten character. Like I said, he has no traits other than arrogant grumpiness and schizophrenic delirium. That is what is written, and Crowe cannot, despite his abilities, bring that to life. As a result, John Nash is not a sympathetic hero worthy of two hours of anyone's time. The real John Nash probably is. But not Akiva Goldsman and Ron Howard's whitewashed one-dimensional portrayal.
Blander than him though is the portrayal of Nash's wife, Alicia. She is objectified from the beginning of the film. There are at least three closeups of her buttocks and breasts with the ogling John Nash looking on in pleasure. When John and Alicia finally connect on a supposedly intellectual level, it is through a series of sexual one-upmanships. Surely there was something unique and extraordinary that connected these two people. And surely it wasn't the cleverness of their sexual innuendoes...When a rift eventually occurs in Nash's marital life, it is portrayed singularly through Nash's inability to hold an erection. What is this film's obsession with reyling on sex as a cheap mechanism?
When Nash's signs of schizophrenia escalate, the filmmakers take the position that insults not just medical science but human reason altogether. Schizophrenia happens to be a very real, harmful disease and this film, by puporting that it can be overcome without the persistent intervention of the medical and psychological community denigrates the ceaseless, tangible pain of those afflicted with it. Furthermore, schizophrenic hallucinations are portrayed as a linear action movie subplot; while dangerous, they're also highly exciting. The movie doesn't present the hallucinations through Nash's warped tv-influenced notions of saving the world; but rather through endorsing those notions with cheapo cardboard stereotypes. I think it's clear that Ron Howard would rather us be excited by the illusionary car chase at hand than Nash's own jaded vision of that car chase. In that respect, the film fails to uncover insight into his unconscious's thought processes. David Lynch's Mulholland Drive, by showing one character's dream, uncovered a whirlwind about that character that was fascinating and psychologically compelling.
I really hated this movie, and I'm sure Holden would have called it "the phoniest of the phony."
A Beautiful Movie
WowI know, I know: it's not totally factual and leaves out some important dirty laundry that the filmmakers would rather have left in the closet, but still.
It's fantastic.


The REAL Horse Whisperer
A memorable movie.Recommended.
For the Horse EnthusiastWe share in Annie MacLean's (Thomas) heartbreak when her daughter is involved in a tragic horseback riding accident. Thomas now has to overcome a stressed marriage and rebuild a relationship with her daughter. To do this, Thomas must help her daughter and her horse that was equally traumatized by the accident heal. Showing her domineering attitude Thomas decides against everyone's wishes to travel across country with her daughter and the horse to find the "Horse Whisperer".
Once there, not only does Thomas find help for her daughter and horse, she also finds love. We see Tom Booker's (Redford) caring touch reach everyone around him. As the daughter and horse heal we see Thomas's situation become more difficult. As the feelings between Redford and Thomas deepen we see her struggle to choose between her family and a Montana life she has grown to love. This is a drama to see, especially for the horse enthusiast. I give it four out of five stars.


When DVDs hit Rock Bottom...First off, there are NO EXTRAS...now, I'll admit, I wasn't surprised by this...Sure the WWF could have opened up the vault and given us some cool stuff leading up to Rock Bottom 1998, but they didn't and it's not the first time they released a DVD without any extras...What can you say, I guess the WWF doesn't "Get It" when it comes to making the DVD more worth buying by adding extras...
But I'm not mad about there being no extras...sure, extras are nice, but they don't have to be included...
What I am mad about is the exclusion of a MENU! How do you exclude a menu from a DVD? Isn't the menu standard? This is the only DVD (in general) I own (and I own a number of DVDs) that has no menu...And no menu means no select a match feature, which means if say you don't want to watch the whole event but rather just want to watch the buried alive match, the main event on the disc...you can't just press and button and be at the start of the match (like you can with other WWF DVDs), oh no, you have to FAST FORWARD throught the whole event...You can't even jump from chapter to chapter because the whole event is one chapter...
Basically the WWF just took the video version of Rock Bottom and transferred it over to a DVD...Very disappointing...
Take a mediocre event, mix it with no extras and NO MENU and you get a DVD worth passing up...Unless this is your favorite event in WWF history (and then I ask why?) or if you already have it on VHS and want to replace the video with a DVD, pass on this one...You'll be happy you did...
pretty good ppv
Good ppv except for one match
Myers's true triumph, though, is his turn as the neurotic Dr. Evil, who tends to spout the right cultural reference at exactly the wrong time (referring to his moon base as a "Death Star" with Moon Units Alpha and Zappa--in 1969). Myers teams Dr. Evil with a diminutive clone, Mini-Me (Verne J. Troyer), who soon replaces slacker son Scott Evil (Seth Green) as the apple of the doctor's eye; Myers and Troyer work magic in what could plausibly be one of the year's most affecting (and hysterically funny) love stories. Despite a stellar supporting cast--including a sly Rob Lowe as Robert Wagner's younger self and Mindy Sterling as the forbidding Frau Farbissina--it's basically Myers's show, and he pulls a hat trick by playing a third character, the obese and disgusting Scottish assassin Fat Bastard. Many viewers will reel in disgust at Mr. Bastard's repulsive antics and the scatological bent Myers indulges in, including one showstopper involving coffee and--shudder--a stool sample. Still, Myers's good humor and dead-on cultural references win the day; Austin is one spy who proves he can still shag like a minx. --Mark Englehart

A lifesaver
Extremely Funny!
The best in the series!