Tracs Movie Reviews
More Pages: Tracs Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25


He's the perfect tenant!

FAST PACED FUN

Good Early DUKE Vehicle...The story follows John Blair (Wayne), and his pal Larry Adams as they leave the Pony Express when it folds. Given two thoroughbred horses each by the defunct mail service, The DUKE sets his mind to opening up a stage line.
When crooked stage line operator Drake sells them the Crecent City run, it looks like John and Larry have wasted their money. Crecent City went bust after the local gold mine played out, and Drake forced all the business to his city. Too bad Drake didn't know he was tangling with The DUKE!
Blair almost singlehandedly brings the town back to life one piece at a time. The one final step in his plan is a stage line mail contract, and it's the Drake line vs. Blair & Adams in a race to Sacremento. The winner gets the big contract, and Drake is out to stop DUKE by hook or by crook!
There's a pretty good plot in this one, and a surprising amount of humor along with the action. Although clocking in at only 55 minutes, there's a lot of young DUKE action!
A fun ride, "Winds of the Wasteland" on this DVD is a great bargain for the price, and no DUKE fan should miss it.

Writer-director Tamara Jenkins clearly loves these characters, and her film has the feel of good-natured autobiography, set in 1976 (without indulging phony nostalgia) and using rich, character-related comedy to express the understanding that all families are dysfunctional in their own functional way. Whether Vivian is allowing a new neighbor (indie-film regular Kevin Corrigan) to touch her breasts or taking cousin Rita's favorite vibrator for a euphoric test-drive, Jenkins and the wonderfully sardonic Lyonne maintain a fine balance of hilarity and sexual awkwardness while giving equal time to Vivian's taunting siblings and well-meaning father. Consisting of loosely connected episodes that add up to a vivid family portrait, this remarkably well-cast film will be a treat for anyone who remembers (or is still going through) the emotional minefield of adolescence. --Jeff Shannon

Not that good ...
Arkin, Tomei, Lyonne, Reiner... you can't go wrong.
The Greatest Movie of All Time

40 Days wasn't bad
okay comedyCelibacy is defined as "the state of not being married" and an "abstention from sexual intercourse." Ask any semi-with it teenager what abstinence means and he or she will tell you it means avoiding sex altogether (and if they're really with it, they'll add "until marriage"). They'll also tell you it doesn't mean to "hold off through the middle of next month." It's a commitment, not a game, as 40 Days would have you believe. One cannot give up extramarital sex for Lent, as Matt does here. Why not? Because one does not give up sins for Lent. Such a premise defies rational thought. But I digress-an easy thing to do when faced with the daunting task of constructing a review of such an "unreviewable" film as this.
Matt is a ladies' man. One is in his bed at least once a week. But he's hung up over one ex-fling, Nicole. He just can't get her out of his head while he's having sex with other women. Frustrated by his lack of clarity, he decides to swear off sex for 40 days during Lent. Celibacy. No sex. No masturbation. No fondling. No kissing. His friends quickly place bets on how long he'll last (Seinfeld, anyone?). And naturally, he immediately meets Erica, the girl of his dreams.
Star Josh Hartnett was so intrigued by the "novel" idea of "temporary abstinence" that he decided to give it a go in his real life. He failed miserably, lasting only a couple of weeks. "I wasn't gonna go 40 days and 40 nights," he said. "It made me a little bit crazy, you know what I mean? It made me understand some of the feelings-just the deprivation. You're depriving yourself of this one thing, and it becomes all you can think about." Hmmm. Only a couple of weeks? Try years. Sexual abstinence until marriage isn't a joke, Mr. Hartnett. It isn't impossible. Or even improbable. And it isn't "cruel and unusual punishment." It's the way God designed us. One partner, for life.
40 Days buys into the idea that abstinence is a malleable obstacle to circumvent. Some teenagers today truly believe that sexual acts such as oral gratification and "outercourse" are okay to experiment with while maintaining their "vows of virginity." In the movie, Matt reinforces that idea by sharing an intensely sexual experience with Erica-even arousing her to the point of orgasm-without touching her. Thus, technically, his vow remains unbroken.
Beyond that, Matt's roommate tells him he's got to give up his vow because his new girlfriend will think he's weird-or gay-if he doesn't sleep with her at least by the third date. And even waiting that long would be inscrutably "old fashioned." And in the end, Matt regrets ever having tried to be abstinent. "I was trying to take a part of me and make it go away," he explains to Erica. "I closed my world off and put it in a little box. For awhile everything seemed clear, but then you came along. . . . I screwed up." To prove it, the happy couple commence a marathon sex-fest-which Matt's friends once again place wagers on.
Anyone who tries to convince you that this film has anything to do with contrasting emotional relationships with sexual ones is deceived. Salon.com critic Charles Taylor even goes so far as to call it an "anti-sex sex comedy." It's not. 40 Days and 40 Nights does nothing more than celebrate illicit sex by, among other things, demonstrating how intolerable life is without it. That's a boldface lie, but it's a lie that a lot of folks have given in to.
Did they switch screenwriters?To me, it seemed like the person who wrote the script was not the same person who conceived it and began the project. Considering that this is a comedy-"romance" marketed at teenagers, the plot is actually rather interesting. There are some good ideas, and occasionally the movie has a burst of humor.
But then the rest of it is so chock-full of stupid ideas that I'm not sure what happened. It seems like any part of the script that attempted to say, "Hey... sex ISN'T everything" was erased and replaced by a lame joke.
I give it 3 stars because some parts of it were actually funny, it is an interesting premise, and because the acting is actually all pretty good - even Josh Hartnett, of whom I'm always suspicious.
But the way it switches it's message back and forth is irritating, and it seems to cheapen the point of the movie. Matt is supposed to be falling in love, yet they never seem to make a point of explaining what love is - in fact, the one time when they try to explain how Matt and Erica are in love is simply this: Erica can have an orgasm without Matt touching her.
My biggest complaint, though, out of all of this... is that Erica is quite easily the absolute least understanding girlfriend character in the history of cinema. It seems like Matt can't do anything without her considering it an insult. The worst example of this is
(Spoiler alert)
when Matt is practically raped and Erica finds him in the aftermath, still bound to a bed. Instead of being sympathetic in the least, she accuses him of cheating and then storms away, leading to Matt's solemn attempts to ask for forgiveness.
VIOLENT CONTENT - None.
SEX/NUDITY CONTENT - Plenty. Toward the end, Matt has visions of naked breasts everywhere, and since the premise of the movie involves sex you can expect that there's a lot of talk about it. Like, say, the entire screenplay.
LANGUAGE CONTENT - Pretty standard R-rated movie cursing.


poorly made
A fun thrill ride of a movie.When taken as a simple thrill ride House on Haunted Hill delivers some wonderfully creepy and disturbing moments, but the movie does suffer from fuzzy character development and plot holes big enough to fit the house itself. What it most resembles is a feature length episode of HBO's now defunct Tales From the Crypt, not surprising when you consider that the producers and director both worked on the show. Still it makes for a great Halloween party movie. Recommended.
Healthy Scare!

Mildly entertaining but very irresponsible
The best!!!!!!
Awesome movie

"Johnny Mnemonic" has a better plot than anything else......
"Cyber-Thriller"?... Definately Techno-Thriller...
UPS vs. chinese mafiaiced tea acts better when he's wearing his sunglasses. when he takes them off you forget that he can act. maybe he reads q cards?
then he gives the computer chip and what's left of his brain to a good guy. keanu does. not iced tea who gets murdered.
i like this movie better than matrix because my coke tasted like windex when i saw the matrix movie and i rented this movie and had cranberry apple juice which i like without ice.


"Johnny Mnemonic" has a better plot than anything else......
"Cyber-Thriller"?... Definately Techno-Thriller...
UPS vs. chinese mafiaiced tea acts better when he's wearing his sunglasses. when he takes them off you forget that he can act. maybe he reads q cards?
then he gives the computer chip and what's left of his brain to a good guy. keanu does. not iced tea who gets murdered.
i like this movie better than matrix because my coke tasted like windex when i saw the matrix movie and i rented this movie and had cranberry apple juice which i like without ice.


"Johnny Mnemonic" has a better plot than anything else......
"Cyber-Thriller"?... Definately Techno-Thriller...
UPS vs. chinese mafiaiced tea acts better when he's wearing his sunglasses. when he takes them off you forget that he can act. maybe he reads q cards?
then he gives the computer chip and what's left of his brain to a good guy. keanu does. not iced tea who gets murdered.
i like this movie better than matrix because my coke tasted like windex when i saw the matrix movie and i rented this movie and had cranberry apple juice which i like without ice.