Partition Movie Reviews


A nice effort from Tom Hanks
Dark, dreary, violent, disturbing movie--but good?
Very good movie

A nice effort from Tom HanksThe movie is flimsy and it betrays it's comic book beginnings. Some camera movements look like comic book framing. However the set design and music saved it alot. Some characters needed more characterization such as Jude Law's hit man, Newman's son and Hank's wife. They may have been plot points in the comic but on film these characters take on quite a different life and they needed more screen time. Jennifer Jason Leigh in particular was very shortchanged. We could have done less with Michael Jr., he was the weakest character and the young actor portraying him was not up to the challenge. It doesn't say much about a film when the main character is shuffled to the side by more minor characters. Unfortunately for us, this film was not about Tom Hank's hit man or Paul Newman's mob boss but about a rather colorless child.
Tom Hank's really stretched his range in this film and this is what I find admirable about it now. His character is a bad man in the beginning and in the end. His only redemption is that he spares his child from his own hit list. Hanks was particularly chilling in the scene after he discovers most of his family dead. The fact that he could walk away from the bodies of his family and tell his only surviving son that they don't have a home was really ruthless. Hanks again surprises during his last few scenes with Newman. However I didn't believe for an instant that Hanks would be afraid of Jude Law's character. Nor that would he be quite so capable of being openly affectionate with his son. However these are only minor faults in a very good performance.
All in all this is not a bad film. But it needs a lot of patience and attention from the viewer to appreciate it.
Dark, dreary, violent, disturbing movie--but good?
Very good movie

A nice effort from Tom HanksThe movie is flimsy and it betrays it's comic book beginnings. Some camera movements look like comic book framing. However the set design and music saved it alot. Some characters needed more characterization such as Jude Law's hit man, Newman's son and Hank's wife. They may have been plot points in the comic but on film these characters take on quite a different life and they needed more screen time. Jennifer Jason Leigh in particular was very shortchanged. We could have done less with Michael Jr., he was the weakest character and the young actor portraying him was not up to the challenge. It doesn't say much about a film when the main character is shuffled to the side by more minor characters. Unfortunately for us, this film was not about Tom Hank's hit man or Paul Newman's mob boss but about a rather colorless child.
Tom Hank's really stretched his range in this film and this is what I find admirable about it now. His character is a bad man in the beginning and in the end. His only redemption is that he spares his child from his own hit list. Hanks was particularly chilling in the scene after he discovers most of his family dead. The fact that he could walk away from the bodies of his family and tell his only surviving son that they don't have a home was really ruthless. Hanks again surprises during his last few scenes with Newman. However I didn't believe for an instant that Hanks would be afraid of Jude Law's character. Nor that would he be quite so capable of being openly affectionate with his son. However these are only minor faults in a very good performance.
All in all this is not a bad film. But it needs a lot of patience and attention from the viewer to appreciate it.
Dark, dreary, violent, disturbing movie--but good?
Very good movie
The movie is flimsy and it betrays it's comic book beginnings. Some camera movements look like comic book framing. However the set design and music saved it alot. Some characters needed more characterization such as Jude Law's hit man, Newman's son and Hank's wife. They may have been plot points in the comic but on film these characters take on quite a different life and they needed more screen time. Jennifer Jason Leigh in particular was very shortchanged. We could have done less with Michael Jr., he was the weakest character and the young actor portraying him was not up to the challenge. It doesn't say much about a film when the main character is shuffled to the side by more minor characters. Unfortunately for us, this film was not about Tom Hank's hit man or Paul Newman's mob boss but about a rather colorless child.
Tom Hank's really stretched his range in this film and this is what I find admirable about it now. His character is a bad man in the beginning and in the end. His only redemption is that he spares his child from his own hit list. Hanks was particularly chilling in the scene after he discovers most of his family dead. The fact that he could walk away from the bodies of his family and tell his only surviving son that they don't have a home was really ruthless. Hanks again surprises during his last few scenes with Newman. However I didn't believe for an instant that Hanks would be afraid of Jude Law's character. Nor that would he be quite so capable of being openly affectionate with his son. However these are only minor faults in a very good performance.
All in all this is not a bad film. But it needs a lot of patience and attention from the viewer to appreciate it.