Actuarial Science Movie Reviews
More Pages: Actuarial Science Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87


Don't Plan On This Plan 9
A Low WatermarkIf you have seen Tim Burton's film Ed Wood, you already know what it took to get this film to release, and can skip this paragraph. For those who haven't, Ed Wood talked a church into backing this film, on the theory that a blockbuster science fiction film would earn back the money invested and more, giving the church a huge budget to make religious films. This film is Bela Lugosi's last film, and in fact, he died during shooting, so someone two inches taller than Lugosi was hired to stalk around menacingly and wordlessly, with a black cape elbowed over his nose. The real "stars" of the film are a man who can barely speak English, and an anorexic late night movie hostess who won't let her real name be used, so is billed simply as "Vampira."
This is probably the worst movie ever made. Robot Monster and Reefer Madness are also in the running, but Plan 9 from Outer Space is much more fun than the others. Look out for toppling over styrofoam tombstones, and cardboard flying saucers hung from visible strings.
The plot is this: aliens, having failed with plans one through eight, move on to plan 9, reanimation of the dead of earth. What the aliens are trying to accomplish with plan 9 is to convince the people of earth to cease nuclear weapons proliferation. By plan 9, they were apprently grasping at straws, because the logic fails me.
This movie is a laugh a minute, albeit unintentionally, and really quite enjoyable as long as you know what you're in for. In the realm of bad films, this film would have five stars.
Easily the Worst Movie ever! Maybe.

Don't Plan On This Plan 9
A Low WatermarkIf you have seen Tim Burton's film Ed Wood, you already know what it took to get this film to release, and can skip this paragraph. For those who haven't, Ed Wood talked a church into backing this film, on the theory that a blockbuster science fiction film would earn back the money invested and more, giving the church a huge budget to make religious films. This film is Bela Lugosi's last film, and in fact, he died during shooting, so someone two inches taller than Lugosi was hired to stalk around menacingly and wordlessly, with a black cape elbowed over his nose. The real "stars" of the film are a man who can barely speak English, and an anorexic late night movie hostess who won't let her real name be used, so is billed simply as "Vampira."
This is probably the worst movie ever made. Robot Monster and Reefer Madness are also in the running, but Plan 9 from Outer Space is much more fun than the others. Look out for toppling over styrofoam tombstones, and cardboard flying saucers hung from visible strings.
The plot is this: aliens, having failed with plans one through eight, move on to plan 9, reanimation of the dead of earth. What the aliens are trying to accomplish with plan 9 is to convince the people of earth to cease nuclear weapons proliferation. By plan 9, they were apprently grasping at straws, because the logic fails me.
This movie is a laugh a minute, albeit unintentionally, and really quite enjoyable as long as you know what you're in for. In the realm of bad films, this film would have five stars.
Easily the Worst Movie ever! Maybe.

Pretty Good Sequel
not my cup of tea but a good movie
fine film/awe-inspiring

Pretty Good Sequel
not my cup of tea but a good movie
fine film/awe-inspiring

Bad Dialogue and VINCENT Taint This Would Be MasterpieceThe prominent area of blame is the screen writers. These folks should have had the reins pulled in on them during the editing phase. The plot has holes, the ending is ambiguous, rules of physics have been ignored and most of the robotic characters (VINCENT and the sentry-'bots) grate on the nerves of the viewer. However, that's not the most glaring eye sore. While the Black Hole still has plenty to offer in visual splendor, even for today's standards, the one thing that keeps me from referring it to a friend (for fear that I will be scorned and ridiculed for ages to come) is the cardboard performances of a talented cast that didn't have anything interesting to say.
Not a great sci-fi flick, but still worth catchingThe ship turns out to be the "Cygnus" a one of a kind mammoth wonder designed by the equally enigmatic Hans Rheinhardt (Maximillian Schell). Though a huge ship, Rheinhardt is mysteriously the only surviving member of the crew - never a good sign in sci-fi. In place of the crew, Rheinhardt appears to have built an army of androids - militant sentries, faceless androids who give the ship the air of a medieval abbey, and Maximillian (no relation) a silent, floating enforcer with whirring blades where his hands should be and a single unblinking eye that seems fixed in an evil stare. Rheinhardt fetes the Palomino crew (which quickly gets over its apprehensions of the reclusive master of the Cygnus) and invites them to witness his planned entry into the nearby black hole. Rheinhardt has pioneered a type of gravity engine which he believes will allow him to enter the black hole safely and learn of its mysteries. As they poke around however, our heroes of the Palomino only find disturbing clues as to what Rheinhardt has been doing all those missing years (the most ominous appears to be an elaborate funeral held by the androids) and even begin to wonder if they will be allowed to escape the Cygnus.
"The Black Hole" doesn't turn up on cable that often, so it's worth at least a rental. The effects are so dated, it's pointless to even try comparing them to anything of our CGI age. Instead, they have their own unique quality which keeps you from dismissing it. The look of the Cygnus seems very un-spaceship like (wide halls and sweeping spaces, unlike the claustrophobic corridors and cloistered nooks of Nostromo) which makes the flick look even more interesting, but only as an extremely expensive episode of "Dr. Who". The problem with the look is that the film has no frame of reference for the state of technology in the future age in which the story occurs. How much of the Cygnus and its robot crew is supposed to amaze us? Are hordes of monkish androids an unsurprising thing to find? Who knows. They could have handled that better by making Roddy Macdowell's character V.I.N.CENT an android, which would have given the Palomino (and us) a better frame of reference. The dialog won't win any awards, but it's not the hokum that others have called it (though with the talent available, the script was bound to fall short). The flick's biggest hurdle is that it's unclear who its for - too violent and ambiguous (especially at the end) for kids, but not exciting enough for adults or teens (like the lasergun battles - no teen would buy robot-sentries who manage to stand still while humans blast them). Schell is great as the sinister Rheinhardt (I don't think he's that overplayed) while Tim Bottoms is also great as the Palomino's resident hot-head. Anthony Perkins seems underplayed as the Palomino crewman who actually buys into Rheinhardt's fantasies, while Ernest Borgnine gets some laughs as the Palomino's journalist who alternates between snooping and cowering (but always thinks of himself). Though it's easy to see what went wrong, I still like to catch this flick when its on. When it came to decide between financing either this flick on one hand or 2 more Herby movies, a sequel to "The Apple Dumpling Gang" and, another remake of "Parent Trap", "The Black Hole" was still the better idea.
A really great movie if you're not too picky. 3 1/2 stars.I like the concept of Disney writing this movie where Ernest Borgnine,Yvette Mimeux,Anthony Perkins are on a mission to chart a black hole in 2130.
Personally, I like the whole idea of the scientist Max Schnell, wanting to take the crew into the black hole.
The ending was great. Some people don't get it. Too cereberal for them I suppose. Ok, it isn't 2001. It isn't supposed to be.
This movie needs to be judged on its own. And when it is, it's pretty good.
Aside from the dialog, and the cute robots, the story is good.


Bad Dialogue and VINCENT Taint This Would Be MasterpieceThe prominent area of blame is the screen writers. These folks should have had the reins pulled in on them during the editing phase. The plot has holes, the ending is ambiguous, rules of physics have been ignored and most of the robotic characters (VINCENT and the sentry-'bots) grate on the nerves of the viewer. However, that's not the most glaring eye sore. While the Black Hole still has plenty to offer in visual splendor, even for today's standards, the one thing that keeps me from referring it to a friend (for fear that I will be scorned and ridiculed for ages to come) is the cardboard performances of a talented cast that didn't have anything interesting to say.
Not a great sci-fi flick, but still worth catchingThe ship turns out to be the "Cygnus" a one of a kind mammoth wonder designed by the equally enigmatic Hans Rheinhardt (Maximillian Schell). Though a huge ship, Rheinhardt is mysteriously the only surviving member of the crew - never a good sign in sci-fi. In place of the crew, Rheinhardt appears to have built an army of androids - militant sentries, faceless androids who give the ship the air of a medieval abbey, and Maximillian (no relation) a silent, floating enforcer with whirring blades where his hands should be and a single unblinking eye that seems fixed in an evil stare. Rheinhardt fetes the Palomino crew (which quickly gets over its apprehensions of the reclusive master of the Cygnus) and invites them to witness his planned entry into the nearby black hole. Rheinhardt has pioneered a type of gravity engine which he believes will allow him to enter the black hole safely and learn of its mysteries. As they poke around however, our heroes of the Palomino only find disturbing clues as to what Rheinhardt has been doing all those missing years (the most ominous appears to be an elaborate funeral held by the androids) and even begin to wonder if they will be allowed to escape the Cygnus.
"The Black Hole" doesn't turn up on cable that often, so it's worth at least a rental. The effects are so dated, it's pointless to even try comparing them to anything of our CGI age. Instead, they have their own unique quality which keeps you from dismissing it. The look of the Cygnus seems very un-spaceship like (wide halls and sweeping spaces, unlike the claustrophobic corridors and cloistered nooks of Nostromo) which makes the flick look even more interesting, but only as an extremely expensive episode of "Dr. Who". The problem with the look is that the film has no frame of reference for the state of technology in the future age in which the story occurs. How much of the Cygnus and its robot crew is supposed to amaze us? Are hordes of monkish androids an unsurprising thing to find? Who knows. They could have handled that better by making Roddy Macdowell's character V.I.N.CENT an android, which would have given the Palomino (and us) a better frame of reference. The dialog won't win any awards, but it's not the hokum that others have called it (though with the talent available, the script was bound to fall short). The flick's biggest hurdle is that it's unclear who its for - too violent and ambiguous (especially at the end) for kids, but not exciting enough for adults or teens (like the lasergun battles - no teen would buy robot-sentries who manage to stand still while humans blast them). Schell is great as the sinister Rheinhardt (I don't think he's that overplayed) while Tim Bottoms is also great as the Palomino's resident hot-head. Anthony Perkins seems underplayed as the Palomino crewman who actually buys into Rheinhardt's fantasies, while Ernest Borgnine gets some laughs as the Palomino's journalist who alternates between snooping and cowering (but always thinks of himself). Though it's easy to see what went wrong, I still like to catch this flick when its on. When it came to decide between financing either this flick on one hand or 2 more Herby movies, a sequel to "The Apple Dumpling Gang" and, another remake of "Parent Trap", "The Black Hole" was still the better idea.
A really great movie if you're not too picky. 3 1/2 stars.I like the concept of Disney writing this movie where Ernest Borgnine,Yvette Mimeux,Anthony Perkins are on a mission to chart a black hole in 2130.
Personally, I like the whole idea of the scientist Max Schnell, wanting to take the crew into the black hole.
The ending was great. Some people don't get it. Too cereberal for them I suppose. Ok, it isn't 2001. It isn't supposed to be.
This movie needs to be judged on its own. And when it is, it's pretty good.
Aside from the dialog, and the cute robots, the story is good.

Why does said genetics corporation want to clone people? How does the kindly scientist (Robert Duvall) fit in? What's the mystery behind the slick billionaire (Tony Goldwyn) who runs everything? It's all kind of irrelevant in the end, as long as it provides a chance for Arnold to indulge in some energetic mayhem and explosive action. What distinguishes The 6th Day is its sneaky, humorous--and chilling--look at the near future, taking everyday technological advances and turning them up just a couple notches, envisioning an era with cloned pets, virtual girlfriends, and computers running most everything, from the refrigerator to your car. Arnold is supposed to be a throwback to the "real" world--you can tell because he cherishes his vintage, navigation-system-free Cadillac--but as usual, he just brings his behemoth presence to the role and not much else. Still, he's a friendly enough hero, and he rolls with the punches (literally) all the way through to the end. Too bad the film overstays its welcome by about half an hour--a little shorter and it could have been a breezy sci-fi/action romp. With scene stealers Michael Rooker, Sarah Wynter, and Rod Rowland as the trio of cloned assassins who always come back--again and again. --Mark Englehart

the govenor vs. clones
A movie that is not a clone of another.
Schwarzie power 2 !!
Why does said genetics corporation want to clone people? How does the kindly scientist (Robert Duvall) fit in? What's the mystery behind the slick billionaire (Tony Goldwyn) who runs everything? It's all kind of irrelevant in the end, as long as it provides a chance for Arnold to indulge in some energetic mayhem and explosive action. What distinguishes The 6th Day is its sneaky, humorous--and chilling--look at the near future, taking everyday technological advances and turning them up just a couple notches, envisioning an era with cloned pets, virtual girlfriends, and computers running most everything, from the refrigerator to your car. Arnold is supposed to be a throwback to the "real" world--you can tell because he cherishes his vintage, navigation-system-free Cadillac--but as usual, he just brings his behemoth presence to the role and not much else. Still, he's a friendly enough hero, and he rolls with the punches (literally) all the way through to the end. Too bad the film overstays its welcome by about half an hour--a little shorter and it could have been a breezy sci-fi/action romp. With scene stealers Michael Rooker, Sarah Wynter, and Rod Rowland as the trio of cloned assassins who always come back--again and again. --Mark Englehart

the govenor vs. clones
A movie that is not a clone of another.
Schwarzie power 2 !!

ode to what could have been ...This movie REALLY could have been mind-blowing had it not been held back by Anderson's chronic lack of any imagination (see my other reviews of Paul Anderson's work). If this material was being molded by ANYBODY with any sense of vision or especially scope, this movie might have been as popular as the Matrix is now. 'Soldier' was CRYING to be done on a grand scale. How cool would it have been to have seen a huge 'Saving Private Ryan' meets 'Attack of the Clones'-type battle scene? Instead we get work that looks like it was done in a high school auditorium.
Look at things like the horribly dull set designs (not bad per se, but just no creativity), the poor lighting, the stereotyped lemming-civilian characters, and the clichéd villains. It's awful how phoned-in this movie just seemed.
The tragic part is that Kurt Russell was terrific in it and was just surrounded by people (actors and production crew alike) that just had no interest (or maybe ability) in trying to add flavor to the VAST RESOURCES they had at their disposal.
I actually cringe when I think about just how cool this could have been compared to the body of work that everyone seemed content to turn in.
You Gotta Be Kidding?!The genetically-bred/robot soldier story has become so cliche and overdone that it would now take a lot more imagination for such a film to be good than what this trash has to offer. Kurt Russel doesn't really act in this movie as he has an even smaller script than Schwarzenneger had in "Terminator." In terms of quality, "Escape From New York" would really be Oscar material in light of this garbage.
The story is utterly predictable and the action is weak. Terrible film. Don't believe the great reviews for this movie and save yourselves both money and time.
"Do you know how much it costs to breed you, you big moron?"Sgt. Todd (Kurt Russell) is a legend in his own time but faces obsolescence when a new generation of genetically-enhanced super soldiers arrive on the scene. When Todd is forced to combat Sgt. Caine (Jason Scott Lee), it becomes painfully apparent that he and his colleagues are inferior to their successors. Todd is left for dead on a junkyard planet but finds a new purpose for himself when he becomes the protector of the planet's inhabitants. Forced into a showdown with the soldiers that replaced him, Todd stands his ground and proves to the military commanders overseeing the battle that new is not necessarily better than old.
"Soldier" is an empty and hollow film which boasts some great visuals but little else. The film feels like a series of skits that were assembled with no transitions between them. Furthermore, the embattled populace that Todd protects is so thinly developed that we form no interest in their plight. When they come under fire, they strike the viewer as merely actors and actresses feigning panic. They do not come across as living, breathing cinematic characters who are being threatened by the situation at-hand. Thus, there is no vested emotional interest in seeing Todd save the day. Making matters worse is the wooden performance Lee delivers. The charismatic Jason Scott Lee from "Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story" (1993) is nowhere to be found here. His character is a bore and easily one of the least-convincing baddies of the 1990's. Russell tries his best to salvage the film but in the end "Soldier" winds up being one of those films that leaves you wondering to yourself why you dropped good money to see it.


Wait for the anamorphic re-release
DVD sound is out of sync
an underrated masterpieceTo me Star Trek Generations is an awesome movie. It is a magnification of the TNG series just as I wanted to see it with great camera movements on the bridge, stunning visual effects in space and a theme that will make you wonder.
Generations catches the true spirit of to the whole cast as well as the Star trek tradition of seeking the nature of human existence.
The death of Kirk had to be in this film. We knew what Spock, Bones and Scotty were doing in the 24th century. And Picard's send off of the most legendary ship captain fo all time made a great closure the the original cast.
Star Trek Generations is the best Star Trek movie after the Motion Picture, it is a wonderful tribute to the whole Star Trek Universe.