Arts Movie Reviews
More Pages: Arts Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86


Deacon John is Outstanding!

Strangely compellingBut it is such a confusing opera -- i didn't know whether to laugh or cry or call a shrink. Anti-wagnerian to the point of being a spoof it would seem but i can't really tell.
Yet i cannot deny its charm.
A Classic For Sure
fascinating productionThe singers act well and they all look their part. And beautiful voices with impeccable French diction from everyone, especially Melisande.
Musically, I think this DVD version is superior to any CD versions and it's visually wonderful to look at, too.


VINTAGE THEATRE TELEVISION
Invaluable for Cobb and Dunnock
Defines DefinitiveJust a note to bear in mind that these plays are film versions of the plays exactly as they were staged on Broadway at the time, so don't look for cinematic production values. Sometimes the camera work is not ideal, but that doesn't get in the way of the consistently powerful performances, and that's what great theater is all about, anyway. I'm just grateful that most of the series is available and hope that the unavailable titles are just being restored and will be rereleased soon.
BEK


"I am not a dime a dozen! I am Willy Loman!!" (4.5 stars)Willy Loman is a tired and heart-broken salesman who no longer lives in the world of reality. Instead, he is trapped in his world of delusions. Each day that passes by seems to be worse and worse for Willy. He spends way too much of his time in the past when he needs to be focusing on the future. His wife and two sons have no idea what they should do for him as they know that he is heading towards disaster in this unforgettable drama.
Like I said, to actually see this really made me appreciate the play more than just reading it from the text. It can get confusing when you only have the words, but when you see it performed it all comes together and make sense. The acting is terrific. Dustin Hoffman really does an outstanding job of playing Willy Loman. Not only does he just "act" the part out, he "becomes" Loman. I admit that I had my doubts at first, because I didn't see him playing the part. My doubts quickly fled from my mind after the first 10 minutes or so. Everybody else is also terrific as well. (Wow, look how young John Malkovitch looks!) I think the movie does a fine job doing Arthur Miller's play justice.
The DVD is pretty neat as well. The picture quality is good, considering the fact that it is an old movie. The DVD also includes a feature length documentary behind the movie, which is really entertaining, and a still gallery. While it may seem like this DVD doesn't have a lot to offer, the documentary really makes it worth-while.
"Death of a Salesman" is a powerhouse drama that hooks you from start to finish. Reading it is one thing, but to actually see it makes it much more enjoyable. If you just read the play from the text it can be pretty confusing at points. If you're looking for a great dramatic movie with great acting and writing, then this is something you should really think about checking out.
A Stunning Realization of Miller's MasterpieceKate Reid gives a strong performance as Linda, Willy's loving and suffering wife. She is vicious in her defense of Willy to her sons, especially at the end, when she orders them to
"get out of this house...get out of my sight." John Malkovich, with his soft-spoken voice and timid manner, might seem unsuited to Biff, the "all-American football hero" -
but I don't think so. To me, Malkovich's halting delivery suggests that Biff is a confused young man who thinks deep thoughts but lacks the education to be able to articulate them well. Malkovich's performance is a revelation in many ways: in the restaurant and final "confrontation" scenes, for example, we sense that Biff now sees Willy realistically for the first time in his life, and is therefore able to act more fairly towards him. The tragedy, of course, is that Willy is still unable to see reality and Biff is unable to MAKE him see it.
Stephen Lang is unobtrusively excellent as Happy, Biff's neglected younger brother. Charles Durning also does an excellent job as Willy's prosperous neighbor, Charley, who has no illusions about Willy (I always laugh when Willy sneaks a look at Charley's cards during the card game scene, and Charley, without a word, turns the cards over so that Willy can see them.). Joseph Polito is fine as Charley's successful son, Bernard. The small roles are all done well, particularly Tom Signorelli as Stanley, the waiter in the restaurant and an old family friend of the Lomans ("Sure, you look...all right."). Schlondorff's direction is great, with so many telling and memorable moments. The hotel-room confrontation between Willy and Biff is affectingly done: Malkovich is touchingly vulnerable, his last cry to Willy of "You fake!" heartrending. The final confrontation between the two was filmed in several "takes," making the viewer feel that he/she is caught right in the middle of a terrifying family argument. Last but not least, the music - especially Willy's idyllic "flute" theme -is very helpful in conveying mood.
No special effects needed; it's all in the words and actingDustin Hoffman stars as Willie Loman, a fading traveling salesman who has made all the wrong decisions in his life. A young John Malkovich plays his son, Biff, a jobless loser. Steven Lang, is cast as his other son, Happy; Linda Reid plays Willie Loman's wife; and Charles Durning plays his neighbor, Charlie. All have been nominated for a variety of awards and Dustin Hoffman won a Golden Globe for best actor that year.
There is no doubt that this is a play, not a movie by the way it is staged. Flashbacks are achieved, for example, by the character Biff, coming on stage in a High School sweater. The characters often seem to be speaking directly to the audience also. I found all this refreshing after watching so many movies where computerized cinematography and special effects are everything.
This play doesn't need special effects. It is all in the words and the acting. And what fine acting it is! I forgot how good a play can be! Especially one by Arthur Miller. The Director, Volker Shloendorff, made his American debut with this production, his prior experience being only in France and Germany. For drama at its finest, I definitely recommend this video.

Little actually happens on stage. The characters circle each other, describing events and emotions which they only half understand. Often, their recitative is introspective rather than a means of external communication. The drama is played out in the landscape of the mind, punctuated and emphasized by Debussy's remarkable, brooding, and atmospheric score. At times, it becomes the swirling stuff of nightmare, an aspect to which John Eliot Gardiner's assured conducting pays close attention. The opera might come to its inevitable end, but there is a strong sense that these ghost-like figures are doomed to repeat their tragic tale endlessly. Uncomfortably haunting stuff, with moments of breathtaking beauty. --Piers Ford, Amazon.co.uk

Bad bad sound!Just can't understand they actually are selling this product!
The Sound is BADIf you already have a good knowledge of this work, the unusual
staging could be described as "interesting"; if you don't,
well, Pelleas and Melisande is already baffling enough (it's
supposed to be). But the sound in the later part of the
disc (after the layer switch perhaps, is this an authoring
error?) is absolutely atrocious. Hopefully Image may be
able to correct this problem, or another video production will
surface. This beautiful music deserves much better.
Dream cast, wonderful musically, but a missed opportunity.Some readers may remember Alliot-Lugaz's outstanding Mélisande from her Decca 3-cd album conducted by Dutoit that came out some 10 or 12 years ago, a recording that preserved her rôle's characterisation in sound that fittingly finds a logical companion in this roughly contemporary video production. Le Roux is the true french baryton, that sort of noble high baritone (or low tenor if you prefer) that comes around seldomly and that makes some rôles in french opera so hard to bring off succesffuly, the true successor to that illustrious line of singers epitomised by Hughes Cuénod. By 1987 Van Dam was still capable of bringing off startling results even though he was past his prime, and the rest of the cast also achieve a superior level of accomplishment. In no less good form are Gardiner and his Lyons forces, to whom he was closely associated at the time, who carry this music (and the whole and very significant cultural baggage behind it) in their blood. So there you are, you're in posession of practically all of the lottery tickets, so what's keeping you from winning out right?
Let's go now into that. First of all, the production itself gets tiresome after a while. Pelléas & Mélisande is a dangerous work to produce in the theatre, there's little stage action per se along the 5 acts, events succeed one another slowly and you may end up with a sublime piece of music that bores your audience, no less. And the ideas put into practice here don't help at all: décors don't change at all, the 5 acts happen in the same drawing room of some large bourgeois house from approximately the time the work was composed, and stage action is mostly evoked rather than actually shown: no forest, no fountain, no sea cave, no tower from which Mélisande's hair hangs down, and so on. So there are many situations where concrete places and events are referred to in the text that don't find a stage correlation, as in for example the very first scene, where Golaud and Mélisande don't actually meet in the forest as is actually sung and supposed to happen on stage, but we rather watch an old and perhaps embittered Golaud who half drunkenly reminisces at those events, which may have taken place many years ago. So you end up listening to a dialogue in which only one of its participants is present and seen (?) but both are heard loud and clear. And so with the rest of the work, there's more that doesn't work in the end in the production than what does: Pelléas & Mélisande's hair hanging from the tower scene happens here in the same drawing room, Mélisane's hair hanging ... from a sofa. The main idea behind the production may seem interesting at first, but does tire after a while. And second, the sound: in my copy at least, it starts okay, begins to deteriorate once the 3rd act begins and keeps going downhill from then on. I don't know if this problem affects only Image's US release (or a portion thereof) or if this defect is also present in the European discs of the same performance published by Arthaus Musik (but they also advertise an NTSC release in their website, so I guess you may care to look it up).
Summing up, I'd state that if your copy's sound is alright throughout (assuming the problem described above affected only a batch of Image's US release from which unfortunately my copy was a part), buy it as many years may still go by before a similar cast is gathered and so successfully bring off the music. Visually, and in spite of some strikingly beautiful images, it is likely that the production will end up losing its interest, so you may end up turning off the TV and just enjoying some of the most glorious music put out during the turn of the XX century, magnificently sung and played by cast and orchestra. But for that perhaps you may have to end up digging up the NTSC Arthaus Musik issue. Image should take note of this problem.


Where is Steve Harvey?
def comedy jam- cedric the entertainer


